Search results

No- you come to the person called Jesus not by applying what He taught. If Jesus meant applying His lessons, He would have said so! Instead He said we have to come to Him! Not His teachings!!!! I apply the teachings commanded, but that only matters after I came to Jesus for salvation! That...

Danie 9 by itself gives no conclusive declaration as to who the Prince of the People who destroy Jerusalem is. Other than history proving He would be some sort of Roman ruler, that is all Daniel 9 tells us. to say it is Jesus is to twist Scripture beyond recognition. But when you look at the...

That is what I said! So what is your issue??????????????????????????

I read what you wrote. so either I misunderstood what you were trying to say or you are just once again bearing false witness. You siad I was lying when I said the Sabbath was just for Israel and then you write it is just for Israel. What is your position? The seventh day was just for...

Well as the 70th week of Daniel or "the tribulation period (that 70th week) haven't occurred yet, yes the rapture is most definitely pre trib as Paul declared in Thesselonians.

Now look at the context and who He was speaking to. It was to the Jews! Even believing Jews today must keep the Sabbath. It is a sign and covenant made by gods with the children of Abraham, I saac and Jacob.

Wrong again! I do not give the 70th week to the AC and Satan. I merely report and the bible says. the prince of the people to come is not Jesus. It is the antichrist. Jesus never made a 7 year covenant with Israel Jesus never caught the sacrifice and oblation to cease 3 1/2 years after teh...

Then I await you posting some as you said you would. To make it easy, list just what you consider the most egregious ones. No English bible has the entire word, with the exception of Kittles 10 volume. They pick a word and many times do not express the intent of the verb. And what is your...

Some do, some don't. Depending on the publisher and writers. the original translations had no "italics". Once again it is a controversial passage. It is 100% true, but not in enough reliable older manuscripts as to be inserted in more modern literal translations. Some add it as a footnote...

Wow you really suck at reading what people believe!!! It is the bible that declares the Sabbath was a covenant between God and Israel and never forced on gentiles other than those who lived in Israel! Exodus 31:12-14 King James Version 12 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, 13 Speak thou...

Well it is clear you are not a careful reader. You said Paul was against the law and was making new laws! So I asked (not stated if you were okay with those sins I wrote. Lying about my words to my face is not desirable. Well I have been asking where you get your understanding and what facts...

Some do, some don't. Depending on the publisher and writers. the original translations had no "italics". Once again it is a controversial passage. It is 100% true, but not in enough reliable older manuscripts as to be inserted in more modern literal translations. Some add it as a footnote...

Well would appreciate what you have found are omissions. Also if you have the stated reasons why, that would be awesome. I have read and listened to the NY over 200 times and done extensive studies in manuscript history. I know the controversy between Alexandrian and Antiochian works. I also...

So you do not believe the church has any laws? Adultery, homosexuality, stealing etc. are all ok by your logic here? But if you read the passage carefully- the passage says it was a teaching, not just for Corinth, but for all the churches. why you refuse to acknowledge that is a mystery.

Everything found in the NT. From Adam to Moses commands were nearly universal. but from Moses to the church most were for Israel. The NT Epistles are the constitution for the church.

The Sabbath was a covenant God made with the nation of Israel only. Teh church has entered into Sabbath rest and we have no command to set aside a specific day.

While it is true many of the more modern translations are somewhat weak, I have discovered they do not harm the principle doctrines of Scripture needed for one to grow and walk with the Lord. 1 JOhn 5:7 is not found in manuscripts until the textus receptus was written. Most believing scholars...

I never said He wasn't. Once again you are merely reciting things from your Watchtower instead of reading what I write. Once again Jesus testified of the entire Ot thusly: John 5:38-40 King James Version 38 And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not...

It is what you posted and I use SCripture to defend my positions. You use your opinion of Scripture to establish and defend yours.

So in other words you have no evidence and just wish to vomit out more venom. OKAY then! You have been exposed. Have the last word if you wish. Bye.