Search results

What more work does Christ need to do for the Jews than to die for their sins? None. You are clueless. I'm done.

You mean Zechariah 12:10? I already told you that Jesus quoted it in a first coming context, so it was fulfilled long ago. No. I've looked at it many times already. You talk to me like I'm someone who just started reading the Bible. I'm tired of your nonsense, so I'm done with you. I know you...

You are not understanding the point. I'm talking about his authority as King and not talking about Him as our King on a personal level in terms of us being in His spiritual kingdom that only believers are in. He said Himself that He has all authority and power in heaven and on earth. That makes...

Of course I know that, but I'm not wanting to play your 20 questions game. Just get to the point. Good grief. Are you like this with people in person? Unbelievable.

No, I haven't. There is something written that is similar in Zechariah 12:10, but that verse has a different context than Revelation 1:7. Zechariah 12:10 is quoted by Jesus Himself in a first coming context in John 19:37. Obviously, Revelation 1:7 has a second coming context. In Zechariah 12:10...

Stop playing games with these questions. Tell me what point you are wanting to make or we're done.

Don't play games. I obviously have thought a lot about all these things that we're talking about, so you don't need to tell me to think about it. What are you talking about here? If you're just going to play games like this then we're definitely done, so let me know.

LOL. I can barely take any more of your nonsense. If what you were saying was actually true, we would see that taught in the New Testament, but we don't. The New Testament authors clearly did not have the same understanding of the Old Testament as you do. I'm going to go with what they taught...

Did He need Israel to recognize and acknowledge Him as their King for that to be the case? No. So, take that into account and adjust your understanding accordingly.

What did you say about there always being a "but"? LOL! You are cracking me up. That's the only reason I'm continuing this discussion. Since He is King now then it doesn't require anyone's acknowledgement for Him to be King, right? Yet, you were saying Israel needs to acknwoledge Him as their...

LOL. Just stop. Deuteronomy 32:1 has nothing to do with Matthew 24:35-39, 2nd Peter 3:3-13, Revelation 20:11 or Revelation 21:1-5. Period. Just stop the charade already so that you don't continue making a fool of yourself.

LOL!!! As I am finding? You clearly have no idea of who you're talking to here. I tell people OFTEN that it has to do with both. But, you are not understanding which verses relate to which events. Only Matthew 24:15-22, Mark 13:14-20 and Luke 21:20-24 relate to what happened in 70 AD in relation...

Your beliefs are incorrect because premillennialism is false. You need to reconsider everything you believe about Revelation 20 and end times doctrine in general because you are way off base on many things.

That is total premillennial dispensationalist nonsense. Christ has been their King for a long time already. Him being the King is not determined by whether or not people acknowledge Him as King. Is Donald Trump only the President to those in the United States who acknowledge him as President or...

Are you a preterist? Christ's second coming has nothing to do with things that happen to Israel. All these things that would take place that would lead to this generation passing away would include the second coming of Christ and the gathering of the elect by the angels as well as false Christs...

And, once again, you didn't even attempt to answer my simple question. How do you think anyone should take you seriously when you refuse to answer simple questions?

LOL! I can learn nothing from you. That is very clear. It's hilarious that you think you are here to teach me. Not at all. I would teach you if you were teachable, but you clearly are not. Matthew 24:35-39 refers to the unexpected second coming of Christ that will result in the destruction of...

In 2nd Thessalonians 1:10, Paul isn't referring to multiple days when Jesus comes "to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe". He refers specifically to "that day" which is the same day when Jesus will be revealed in flaming fire from heaven with His angels to...

Excellent point. It seems that placing a chapter break after 2 Thessalonians 1:12 was just as inappropriate as placing one after 1 Thessalonians 4:18, which I didn't really notice before you pointed this out. It causes some people to not realize that the verses in both 1 Thessalonians 4:13-5:9...

No, it wasn't. It was a legitimate but. So what. You have yet to do anything to prove that passages like Matthew 24:35-39, 2nd Peter 3:10-12, Revelation 20:11 and Revelation 21:1-5 are not referring to the literal heavens and earth. Your arguments have been extremely weak so far. All you've...