Search results

He's just jealous. He's very childish, as you can see. Amen.

Right. Being changed is not the same as being resurrected. He is coming up with the idea that even those who are alive and remain until the second coming of Christ have part in the first resurrection as a way to try to reconcile his view with what it says in Revelation 20:6. But, no one can...

Arrogant people like that, he says. Every one of your posts oozes arrogance. You act like you are the chosen one who has the proper understanding of the words "zao" and "zoe" and no one else here does. You are the one who thinks that everyone else is wrong about what happens when Jesus returns...

I didn't create the label Amillennialism, either, but my belief fits that label, generally speaking (not all Amils believe everything the same). The belief that the thousand years occurs after Christ returns is called Premillennialism and that is what you believe. Your gibberish about "-isms"...

LOL. Says the guy who believes in Premillennialism.

This again? You are obsessed. OSAS vs. NOSAS has absolutely nothing to do with the Amil vs. Premil debate. You constantly go out of your way to try to disprove Amil with your nonsensical imaginary ideas. You apparently have no interest in being taken seriously. LOL! Does he represent literally...

Agree 100%. This thread probably hasn't gone the way he had hoped. LOL.

You have clearly lost it. Just because he disagrees with your end times view, you are questioning his salvation? What is wrong with you? What has WPM done to give you the idea that he might not believe in Jesus? He glorifies Jesus constantly in his posts and you have the gall to ask him this...

He has answered every argument that you have made. You just don't like the answers. It makes you look very bad to lie and claim that he hasn't addressed your arguments. He has done so extensively.

This is a ridiculously weak argument. A vast majority of scripture is about to things that happened or are happening to people who are physically alive. It rarely talks about those who are dead and what they are doing after their physical deaths. So, naturally, a vast majority of the time you...

How can Premils read John 5:24-25 and deny that those who are saved experience a spiritual resurrection (not the literal resurrection of our spirits, but going from being spiritually dead in sins to spiritually alive in Christ)? How does that happen? When we have part in Christ's resurrection...

Why are you equating a bodily change from being mortal to immortal with a bodily resurrection from being bodily dead to bodily alive? It's called the first resurrection, not the first change. Look at what Revelation 20:6 says about those who have part in the first resurrection and tell me if...

Blah blah blah. Same old thing from you. All nonsense. The word "zao" simply means to live or to be alive. Unless you believe in soul sleep there is no reason to think the word can't be applied to those who are physically dead, but whose souls and spirits are alive in heaven. As for the word...

And it's been that way for many years. Nothing ever changes in that regard.

Why waste time sharing your opinions without being able to back them up with scripture? You never give any coherent arguments using scripture to back up your claims, but you still expect people to just take your word for things. That's not how debates work. You need to be able to defend your...

In other words, you have nothing to refute what I said. So, this response is all you could muster. Your posts are very, very weak and unconvincing, David. I can barely take you seriously because you are apparently unable to form even one coherent argument to support Premill. You are in way over...

In your opinion. But, I don't believe you can convincingly support your opinion. By taking this literally, you are missing what that passage is about. That is about the church preaching through the power of the Holy Spirit with nothing being able to stop the spread of the gospel throughout the...

You don't read scripture carefully at all. You read it through a biased Premil lens and that causes you to often miss what it means. Let's look at the text carefully, which I am certain you have never done before. Matthew 24:35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass...

This type of reasoning is how pre-tribs decide that 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17 is not the same event as Matthew 24:29-31. They say there is no mention of the angels gathering the church in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17, so it can't be the same event. As if every passage about an event has to contain all...

Yes, your posts prove that repeatedly. You lack the discernment to know when scriptures relate to each other and when they don't. Ask God for wisdom about that (James 1:5-7). Where do you see anything there about Michael and his angels going to war against Satan and his angels? Nowhere. Just...