Search results

No, you are the one adding. Where do you get the idea that God could accomplish the salvation He does any other way? Why would God choose such a torturous death for His Son if there was any other way? No...it is you and others that are adding lies about God. Stranger

Your views of me have no effect upon me. Perhaps you're scared of what Scripture says instead of me. Stranger

(Luke 17:17-19) "...Were there not ten cleansed? but where are the nine?...." Stranger

(Rom. 13:1-7) is definitely talking about the political powers. God has demonstrated and stated before that all political powers are from Him, no matter how just or unjust they appear to man, and irregardless of what the powers think of themselves. See (Is. 10:5-16). Also, (Dan. 4:17)...

They do prove that Christ's sacrifice was needed by God in order to have the believer saved and acceptable before Him. There was absolutely no other way. Just as I showed you in (Rom. 3:26) "...that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus." God could not ever...

That is fine because we are ashamed also that you call yourself Christian. It is good that we agree on this. Stranger

No, that is the teaching of Scripture. And I explained how these Scriptures prove God needed the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ to find any believer saved and acceptable to him. You on the other hand just say things such as 'No they don't'. And then provide nothing. Well, everyone's got one of...

Concerning (Rom. 8:7), you brought it up first in post #173. I responded that it says nothing about loss of salvation or keeping the law. If you think it does, then show me how it does. If you, or any other believer go back to the law as the means by which you walk and attempt to please God...

Since what has been said in the opening post is a lie, then this is certainly a fight for truth. The verses I gave do prove God needs the Sacrifice of Christ to make one saved and acceptable to Him. Stranger

Why is it boring? I have showed you where it is impossible for God to accept anyone without the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. If you can prove other wise, then do it. Just saying 'boring' proves nothing but your inadequacy. Stranger

What a perverted view. I have given Scripture to show you that it is impossible for you to be found acceptable to God without the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. To which you do not answer. So, how about it? Stranger

Yes, for God. It is impossible for you to be found acceptable to Him without the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. To even suggest that God could have found us acceptable another way is appalling to me. Again, the verses I gave prove it. (Rom. 3:26) (Eph. 1:4) (Rom. 4:7-8) The opening post is...

It is impossible for you to be found acceptable to God without the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. For you to be under grace means you are a sinner. Else no need for grace. (Rom. 4;7-8) Stranger

As I stated before in #24, as proven by (Rom. 3:26), Jesus Christ sacrifice is necessary to God so that He might be just in justifying us. This is finding us acceptable to God as (Eph. 1:4) states. "According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be...

Yes, God needed Jesus Christ sacrifice to make His people righteous and acceptable before Him. (Rom. 3:26) "To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. Without the sacrifice of Christ God would be unjust in...

Again, you used (Rom. 8:7). Make your point. If you don't know what it means, just say so. I have explained (John 5:14, and 8:11). Your questions add nothing to the argument. Concerning (Luke 1:5-6), my statement you highlight is that the believer couldn't keep the law before Christ...

God hardened Pharaoh's heart because he wanted Pharaoh to contend with Him so that He could show His power before all Israel. The answer is already given in the verse you cited. See also (Ex. 11:9-10). So, you understand why God did it. You just don't know if you want to believe it...

I never liked John MacArthur's teaching, no matter what it was on. His radio program, falsely called 'grace to you' was not grace at all. It was nothing but grace plus works. Plus, in the tenor of MacArthur's voice was always a 'holier than thou' presentation. A condescending tone which...

You're the one that used (Rom. 8:7) to prove something. Why should I have to explain it to you. As I said, I have no problem with it. It certainly doesn't teach any loss of salvation or law keeping. Concerning (John 5:14, 8:11), Jesus told them to 'go and sin no more' because they had both...

Just what are you trying to prove with (Rom. 8:7)? It says nothing of loss of salvation or law keeping. I have no problem with it. What is yours? In (John 5:14) Jesus is warning the man he healed that his illness was due to judgement and Jesus warned him to go and sin no more. So? In...