Search results

Yea, that’s what I meant when I said I would not refuse it.

Yup. Nothing about Jesus. How can a thing be WITH something and BE that same something at the same time?

At that time people began to invoke the name YHWH. Genesis 4:26

In that other thread, the poster cannot even bring himself to acknowledge God's name, let alone that Jesus' God is this God.

Welcome to the forums. This thread is diametrically at odds with the post in this other thread.

Of all the ridiculous things you've most, this rises to the top. Acknowledging and using God's name is how it is remembered and kept holy. Ex 3:15. Those who don't use God's actual name attack it. Ever watch Harry Potter? It's not supposed to be like "He who shall not be named."

An item suggests a material thing. An IDOL is anything manmade, including fame, fortune and conquest (of woman, business, nations).

LOL. The ethical issues regarding EOL do not pertain to plumbing or road construction. Of course it pertains to the medical profession!

I've answered this question multiple times already. You are not understanding what I am writing. We "play God" and should "play God" before and @ EOL.

LOL. Semantics. My position is consistent in us "playing God" by even having a medical profession whose entire mission is NOT to "let nature take its course." What I think is correct is to act on our God-given knowledge of Good and Evil. This includes active and passive euthanasia as a subset...

Yup. The truth is extreme. Right is extreme. Yes. No. Not sure where you are going with this. Hmmm. I have a fully developed philosophy of life. This means I've thought things through to the fundamentals. Regarding your apparent dichotomy between ideology and practical application in the face...

I've avoided this thread until now because it is more of the same concerning line of troubled thought. Your persistence suggests a desperation that I do believe is beyond human capacity to help. Yet, I feel prompted by the Spirit this morning. It's not the question but the attitude, the lack...

No! I am not cherry picking. The subject is NOT whether there are verses in Scripture where God says he loves certain action. The subject is why Allah is not YHWH. And the difference is there are verses in Scripture where it says God loves us (unconditionally). The same cannot be said of Allah...

Bless you. I'm sure that was a difficult time for you. I decided when the time came, if my grandfather asked, I would act to end his EOL suffering no matter what the legal consequences were. It did not come to that.

If you want to be consistent in opposing euthanasia, yes. An injury could lead to infection, which could lead to death. Why are you advocating we "play God" in one instance but oppose it in another instance?

"Stopping treatment" is called passive euthanasia.

Like in all things, it is less about understanding and more about respecting. I said to my Pastor recently that respect only matters when there is disagreement. Otherwise, you are not respecting the other person, who are respecting your own thought processes.

Nope! That's exactly what I mean. It's Black and White. Either we "play God" with everything or we do not with anything. As a kid I got severe strep throat many times. I have no doubt if not for modern medicines, I would have died then. Preventing death is playing God just as much as EOL is for...

Putting aside the CC change, abortion and euthanasia have been ethical issues since antiquity. I know I’m in the minority and reject the ‘slippery slope’ fallacy of being in favor of EOL care. Not gratuitous suicide but driven to minimize suffering. IMO, every medical treatment ‘plays God’ in...

No. It’s not about forgiveness. She did nothing to me. It’s about PREFERENCE. Men are allowed to have and act on their preferences.