Search results

Rather the converse; I'm insisting some kind of mortality that needs some means of deviating (Tree of Life) to prevent the default consequence of being mortal, namely, death.

Speculation. I showed you how they are not the same but are essentially different in very simple terms. There is more, a lot more that shows the God worshipped by "people of the book" is not the same as the Prince of Darkness, masquerading as the Angel Gabriel. Killing infidels is NOT love of...

Yes. John 3:16 comes to mind. That not one single thing n the Koran states Allah loves us - even infidels - is chilling. That you shrug it off as equal to not live but mercy is even more chilling.

When talking to unbelievers who claim observable evidence is their guide, Psalm 19 comes to mind; not just the Word but the Works of God may light our path.

Huh? If we were made immortal, what purpose would the Tree of Life serve?

Not mentioning AT ALL that Allah loves us is not the same as Allah mentioning more something else. IMO, you are not squaring up to the truth of the matter.

This somewhat I fringes on a topic we are not allowed to discuss.

Judeo-Christian is the same, yes. Allah is not the same character - with certainty, as already shown by the absence of love in Islam.

No love eh?

Here is how. If animals, including man, were not born to die from the beginning there would be no purpose to the Tree of Life.

Friend, learn to discern non-existence from those in denial of what does exist. Evidence of Jews being in Israel from antiquity is beyond doubt. Evidence of the exodus also exists. Just because atheists want proof - beyond reason - does not mean that evidence does not exist.

Another golden nugget from the Ark Encounter ... Radioactive decay half life. Scientists say rock layers form over 100's of million of years. In 1980, Mount Saint Helens deposited numerous wrong layers IN MINUTES. Samples were sent to 5 different and independent labs to determine the age of...

Exodus evidence found. Chariot Wheels At Bottom Of Red Sea

I always took the Creation narrative as anecdotal, which means you can pick up being redeemed by Christ's payment. Last week I went to the Ark Encounter and Creation Museum in Kentucky. I now have doubts about the Creation narrative being anecdotal. The founder, Ken Ham, has a 5 part book...

I watched another vid yesterday of a highly entitled women. She said the only way she would consider someone her bf is if they pay her bills. The narrator suggested that not many men will be signing up for that. In the long run, this explains why many women: A. "Hit the Wall" B. End up bitter...

That's an understatement. She wanted a slave; someone to perform labor for no compensation. She was a user. Lots of women use men. Women are so dramatic when they get used but it is certainly not a one way street. Regarding entitlement, many women feel men have no right to say no to any request.

Pancho, I'm disappointed you opened another JW bashing thread. I know that was not your intent. Bashers gonna bash.

Word games! They would most certainly be lying. The question, do you have an X is a general question. You cannot deny having an X on the grounds of inserting a limiting qualifier. I don't have an electronic device on the grounds that it is not new, white, large, borrowed, etc. Foolishness!

Saw a great answer recently in the form of a little Christian girl. When asked to convert, she said she would if anyone can show her where in the Koran that it says Allah loves her.

You disagree? It is not an argument! I'm not making an argument. I'm sharing what I have experienced and KNOW first hand. I don't know why you are devoted to actively opposing people sharing their miraculous experiences on account of an obvious false belief. It's very revealing about you.