Search results

The book is irrelevant as it does not save - no matter how you interpret it.

Showing the fallacy of your entire position. 1st, a witness testimony is the proof. 2nd, if witness testimony is not proof, then a book compiling witness testimony is also not proof.

One other point I want to make is from Acts 4. 7 “By what power or by what name did you do this?” 10 ... the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth ... 12 And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” This name by which we...

A covenant does not have to be confirmed to be valid. Only those that are germane to the elements of the covenant. For instance, the Amendments to the US Constitution do not replace the entire constitution. They supercede only those aspects that the new Amendments address. In this way, the...

My God is not a book or manmade doctrines. My God is the living God who extended prevenant Grace to a wretched soul like me.

You never seem to tire of being wrong.

Another victim of Islamic Propaganda. There is a difference between a Muslim and Islam. A Muslim is a person who has been more victimized by the evil ideology of Islam than anyone else.

Islam has 2nd class citizens. In Islam 'People of The Book' have no right to self defense.

No. The key is to act on answered prayers - with a grateful and humble heart.

In my devotional reading yesterday, I came across the powerful Galatians 3, titled in CEV as "Faith is the Only Way." It does not say knowledge and faith are the only 2 ways. Excerpts: v2: How were you given God's Spirit? Was it by (knowing and) obeying (external action) the Law of Moses or by...

Syrian gangs not helpless refugees. Best to keep immigrating Islamists. Only good can come from it.

Isn't this a forbidden topic? So, a verse that applies to the 2 kingdoms warring during the time of Isaiah and the future destruction of Judah and Israel (Isaiah 7:10-17) applies to 1st century as a good sign? This video makes the negative sign referred to crystal clear.

I am Groot. His name is Jesus - no matter what they call him. :p

It's just that you are taking "God is with us" literally. This phrase applies to many in the OT. No one thought it meant literally.

I refuse to be mislead by the worst translation known to exist in English. Matthew 1:23 Complete Jewish Bible 23 “The virgin will conceive and bear a son, and they will call him ‘Immanu El.”[a] (The name means, “God is with us.”) Nope. Romans 10:9 says our salvation depends on saying Jesus...

Seems we cannot be on the same page when I am talking about his name and you are talking about what he is called AS IF that is the same thing. Make A Blessed Day!

@jessicaleks93, Did you check out the JW in person?

Was his name Emmanuel or Jesus? Your flexibility of what someone's name is is something to behold.

False Alternative. There is not one verse in the Bible that says something like the Jews stone to death God incarnate. Also, notice that Jesus did not say he is. Rather he referred them to Ps 82:6. Are we all gods or not?

Again, if true, you’d provide the verse - not the chapter.