Search results

Seems that you are equating accuracy with precision. ‘More agreement’ is a proxy for precision, not accuracy. Precision is repeatability. Accuracy is hitting the target. Precise manuscripts that are not accurate are not helpful at all.

No. My conscience is not being pricked. You are annoying and harassing me. See the difference? Guess what? Me might not agree on things. Let it go.

What is the question, exactly?

How about you stop trying to be my conscience? In addition, how about you stop chasing this from threat to thread? Your attempt to justify yourself failed. This thread is about a prayer another poster made but she didn't like the answer. It's not about me or whatever idea you got in your head...

It's amazing how many non-JW's let them live - rent free- in your mind. I suppose you'll deny mocking your fellow Christ follower? A scoffer does not like to be reproved; he will not go to the wise. Proverbs 15:12 ESV

The OP asked the actual question - not you. And there is no question (mark) to be seen in your post. Do I? With respect to you, it is because you seem to make the same post no matter the OP topic.

Bless your heart!

Huh? Are you saying there are no unfulfilled prophecies left for Jesus? If so, why is there a 2nd Coming?

You did not post verses that claim what you say. If you already posted them, it should be easy to cite the verse that says Jesus was worshipped because he is a deity. Just show the Scripture verse! Thanks.

Yet, no verse in sight.

Rebuking is not a requirement. Jesus did not rebuke the Pharisees who wanted to stone him. Does that mean their claim that he was not a deity is correct?

No verse says what you claim.

This is not that complicated. She prayed for a sign. She received a sign. That she did not like where the sign pointed is irrelevant. Jonah did not like the sign of being pointed to Nineveh to tell them Judgement is at hand.

To a certain extent, this is semantics. If a human bows down and "worships" another human being (even if in their mind that person is God incarnate), it does not mean the human being is God, e.g., Caesar, Augustus, and here for a long list of others. People who make this kind of argument imply...

Laps on ground already covered.

You keep moving the goal posts. Covenants that exist from covenants that are abolished. For instance a law that was used to determine the winner of the 1800 election is not later abolished to retroactively invalidate the 1800 election.

That's not relevent to the conversation. And it is interesting to note that the source of this new testament is found in the OT book of Jeremiah.

Woah! I did not say the covenants do not exist. I said they do not have to be confirmed as you imply, which is merely a Strawman, supposing only what is in the NT is valid. Also, several of the covenants are unilateral restrainst God put on himself, such as to Noah in not destroying the world...

I already expressed it. Perhaps it was too simple for you to grasp. No it doesn't. Paul wrote that if anyone teaches another Gospel, even if Angels from heaven, let him be accursed. Yet, with the Book, there remain all kinds of doctrines. The Bible argues with your position and many Scriptural...

Circular Reasoning. Knowledge necessary for what?