Search results

LOL. You are so jealous and petty. Grow up. David, will you never grow up? What does any of this have to do with the Premils he referenced believing in heretical things, which is what I was talking about? Why aren't you addressing that? You're trying to change the subject instead. Why don't...

LOL. Your responses are very weak. There were relatively few Gentiles saved in those times compared to New Testament times and you know it. You make passages like Ephesians 2:11-13, Acts 26:17-18 and Hebrews 2:14-15 meaningless because you act as if nothing changed in relation to Satan and in...

LOL at you not being able to discern that Luke wrote to a different audience (Gentiles) than Matthew and Mark did which means him telling the readers to understand the prophecy from Daniel would have made no sense. How about you stop your incessant meaningless rhetoric and explain, if Matthew...

Hahaha. This should be entertaining....a Premil trying to tell me about paying attention to context....that is hilarious... Talk about missing the context. Wow. What did Peter relate that to? Read verse 9. He was relating that to how long it was taking Jesus to return. From man's perspective...

Wow. There were not plenty of Gentiles saved from the beginning of time until Jesus came. Do you understand that? Why are you making what is written in the following passage meaningless, as if what is written here has always occurred? Acts 26:16 But rise and stand on your feet; for I have...

If you disagree with my interpretation of those scriptures, then how about you share your interpretations of them to show how you think I'm misinterpreting them? Douggg, you are so clearly trying to do anything you can to avoid telling me how you interpret Luke 19:41-44 and Matthew 22:1-7. Why...

Did you read his original posts of this thread? I think what he said about some of those early Premills is an accurate description of heretics because they taught non-Christian heresy. He made it clear that he wasnt saying that Premillennialism itself is heretical. Do you understand that? Prove...

Doug, I'm backing up my claim with scripture and you want me to look something up on Google instead. Why did you not address the scriptures I used to back up my claim? How do you interpret these passages: Luke 19:41 Now as He drew near, He saw the city and wept over it, 42 saying, “If you had...

You are the one who brought up Catholics, not him. You derailed the thread with your out of the blue post that had nothing to do with what anyone was talking about.

So? What is your point? Again, that is meaningless as it relates to when the old covenant actually ended and was made obsolete, which was at the cross. By trying to make 70 AD the end of the old covenant age, you are promoting something not taught anywhere in scripture. If there was such thing...

That is not true. I just can't be taught by someone lacking in spiritual discernment like you. I made no such claim, liar! You obviously didn't read anything I said carefully at all. I agree with that and didn't say otherwise! This proves that you were lazy and made no effort to actually read...

What does any of this have to do with the topic of this thread?

No one is saying otherwise, but that doesn't address the point being made. What does that have to do with what is written in Acts 26:17-18 in relation to Gentiles being turned from the power of Satan to God? How about you actually address the point instead of evading it? What happened that made...

That's meaningless. Does that change the fact that the old covenant was made obsolete by the death of Christ? No.

You just won't stop with your promotion of false preterist doctrine. Peter indicated that we should look at things from God's perspective when it comes to the timing of Christ's return (2 Peter 3:8-9), so Peter was not saying that the end of all things was near from the human perspective in 1...

Look here, newborn in Christ. You have nothing to teach me. No one who can't even discern that Satan is a real, living being (a fallen angel) has anything to teach me. You're not even addressing anything I said in my post. Are you afraid to do so? I showed the things that clearly related to...

You didn't address what he said when pointing out this passage... Acts 26:17 I will deliver you from the Jewish people, as well as from the Gentiles, to whom I now send you, 18 to open their eyes, in order to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, that they may...

You clearly have no understanding of this passage... Luke 19:41 Now as He drew near, He saw the city and wept over it, 42 saying, “If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things that make for your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes. 43 For days will come upon...

Yes, but He did that at the cross and not in 70 AD.

Where did I say I do not care? Nowhere. How about addressing what I did say? Your false full preterist doctrine is not of the Spirit, but of the flesh, so I don't need any lectures from you.