Search results

This says it all about you. I did agree with everything you had said up to that point, but you say "doubtfully!". Who do you think you are to say otherwise? I know what I believe and I know I agreed with what you said about Jesus's body being the temple and the church being the temple of God and...

Empty words from you again. It's all I can expect from you, apparently. You can't accept that scripture is sometimes very simple and straightforward. You must think "Surely, that text can't be literal! That would be too easy and simple! No, I must find a way to make it as convoluted as possible...

That is what Matthew 22:7 indicates, but you lack the discernment to see it because of your doctrinal bias. If you read Matthew 23, Luke 19:41-44 and Matthew 22:1-7 it should be clear that it was God's plan to punish the Jews for their rebellion against Christ and that's exactly what He did...

Why would you not think that Matthew 24:9 is parallel to Luke 21:17? Luke 21:17 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake. Matthew 24:9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. These are clearly...

The answer is nowhere to all 3 questions, of course. The claim that Revelation 3:10 proves a pre-trib rapture has to be the weakest argument that I've ever seen in relation to anything. Not just the Bible, but anything at all. It's an absolutely ludicrous argument. We're supposed to believe that...

LOL. You just have what I said confused with your own posts. As if Matthew 22 is not in the Bible? Your treatment of that parable along with many other scriptures that should be easy to discern is embarrassing. No one makes simple things convoluted more than you do. Yes, I have. You just lack...

Because the "little while" is a reference to the little while that people are told to hide from God's wrath and it's not referring to anyone waiting a little while for Christ's second coming. Come on, man. Are you even trying? If you're not going to bother reading what I'm saying carefully, then...

Buddy, you must have really terrible reading comprehension skills because I have NEVER denied any of that. I agree with all of that. You treat me like I'm a preterist, but I'm not. Get that through your head. But, none of that changes that God also punished the Jews in 70 AD by destroying many...

I address more of your points than any person ever should bother spending time doing, so stop whining. Don't blame me for your terrible communication skills. I'm just going by what you say. Learn to be more clear. You never did clear up what your point was regarding what happened to the seven...

Where does scripture teach that? Nowhere. So, stop sharing your opinions that you can't support with scripture. It's a waste of time. LOL. You can't be any less discerning than this if you tried. In John 10 the two folds are Jewish believers and Gentile believers who were brought together as...

I had to make it clear how hilarious your comment was. Not even 20 exclamation points would have made that clear enough. Your posts are a total joke. You are not able to discern the difference between what is literal and what is figurative and what is physical and what is spiritual. You're more...

LOL. You have no discernment whatsoever. It's a minor miracle that you are an Amil. I truly don't know how that happened when you get so many things wrong. That parable is about the preaching of the gospel that started in Jerusalem and went throughout Israel. Matthew 22:7 is about what God did...

Hey, buddy, don't blame me for how you come across which is that you try to spiritualize every single verse of scripture that you come across. So, why would you not think that event, which had a very significant impact in Jerusalem and on the Jews as a people group, would not be referenced at...

I agree 100%. He is so far out of his depth that I would compare it to someone who can't swim being in the deepest part of the ocean. AI cannot compete with the Word of God and the Holy Spirit.

What is your case? Stop playing games and tell me what your point is here? You acknowledge that they were actual churches, so something obviously caused them to cease to exist. There's some info online about them you can look up related to what happened to them. What is the point? Grow up and...

LOL. As if no historical documents besides the Bible contain any truth in them? How do you interpret this passage: Matthew 22:1 And Jesus answered and spoke to them again by parables and said: 2 “The kingdom of heaven is like a certain king who arranged a marriage for his son, 3 and sent out...

You are clueless. You act as if someone can only either believe that God's wrath came against Jerusalem in 70 AD when the physical temple buildings were destroyed or they can believe that Christ's body was the temple and the church collectively is the temple of God, but not both. What a joke...

In scripture? It doesn't tell us that specifically in scripture. There is information given online about what happened to those churchest, so you can look that up for yourself. They obviously don't still exist today. What is your point here? Stop playing games and get to the point.

Agree. These scriptures you're sharing are very clear and straightforward. Premils deny that and twist and blatantly manipulate those passages to say something completely different than what they clearly indicate. And, when we look at the parallel account of that same event that Paul gives in 1...

Notice how his view is based on major assumptions that he makes about passages that make no mention of the rapture whatsoever. His beliefs come only from his imagination. Premils on this forum prove the point I made about the difference between Premils and Amils over and over again. Premil (and...