Search results

No. Your interpretation of Scripture is theory.

Your theory makes no sense. The old law is different than the new law under Jesus sooooo what is "necessary" now was not "necessary" then and what was necessary then is not necessary now. Worship changed from Saturday to Sunday, dietary restrictions, circumcision, what Jesus said we must do...

Hi Marks, I do not "know" what they meant by that statement (authorized for public use). I can only presume that it was the first bible to be printed using "public" money (taxes). Do you know why? I do know that The Great Bible was also called The Chained Bible because it was often chained...

Hi Nancy, Well, it's not really a "back and forth" because you made a statement that I asked you to back up and you didn't sooooo really it is just you making statements and not backing it up with facts. For it to be a back and forth you would make a statement (which you did). I would ask you...

Hi Triumph, LOL....You do know that the Crusades wasn't meant to be "evangelism"? The Crusades were started because the Muslims were killing Christians and forcing them to convert to Islam at knife point? Why don't you know your own Christian (and world) history? :mad: Here is a BRIEF...

Hi Enoch, The "Sola" theory doesn't work: Sola Scriptura (“Scripture alone”) Sola Fide (“faith alone”) Sola Gratia (“grace alone”) Solus Christus (“Christ alone”) Soli Deo Gloria (“to the glory of God alone”) How can one stick to FIVE different "alones"? The Sola theory started 1,500 years...

Ummm.....you do know I can quote what you said and here is what you said: "The CC's doctrine specifically states that the pope's ex-cathedra statements (and certain doctrines of the church) are more authoritative than the Bible itself..." You NEVER said "I believe".....You made a flat out...

Well....Yes YOU DID....you are an intriguing person. o_O

You encourage everyone to use their minds and reason but when one does that you tell them they are wrong unless they agree with you....Fascinating. I gotta go but you are a very interesting person....talking in circles and such. Not backing up your statements etc. simply...fascinating

Ummm.....I never said that CC doctrine takes precedence over Scripture. You did!! o_O

It's up to the listener???? o_O Sooooo no one can ever tell me if I am wrong since it is up to me.....Why do you keep telling me I am wrong? Your violating your own theory....;)

Your statements do not hold the same authority as the word of God soooo why should anyone accept your interpretation of Scripture? In your book WHO's statements do hold some authority? Curious Mary

And the Bible has more authority than your doctrine....back to square one kiddo.

Would the Apostolic and Church Fathers meet that criteria? Curious Mary

Wow....that's pretty broad. Do the men of the CC fit your broad criteria?

It's pretty simple kiddo. You made a statement. You didn't back it up. You failed. It is not up to me to back up a statement of yours that I disagree with!

Oh boy....someone is cherry picking Scripture and taking it out of context to fit their personal belief instead of what was taught to us by God. You forgot the other two passages that put tradition in a positive light: 2 Thessalonians 2:15, 1 Corinthians 11:2! YOU say its a dirty...

It's pretty simple kiddo. You made a statement. You didn't back it up. You failed. It is not up to me to back up a statement of yours that I disagree with! Mary

Thank you. Who's doctrine does have the word of the Lord to back it up? Curious Mary

Soooo you don't know him?