Search results

I don't want to accuse you of bearing false witness but no one in this thread even made the claim that OJ was found by a jury to be guilty of double murder. He was found guilty by a jury for other crimes and found by a jury to be liable for the death of Ron and Nicole.

Says you. Fact is, Kato thinks OJ is guilty as do millions of others. Why does it bother you so?

You keep confusing reality with a political process. Politics does not dictate reality, although our overlords have convinced you of it. When the FDA says the COVID vaccine is safe and effective, that does not mean that it is in reality. You cannot seem to admit that just because a jury found...

Kato thought he was guilty and so do I and millions of others.

No. I asked questions first. Seems you want to be the only one who can ask questions. Being found not guilty does not mean someone is innocent. Correct? Failing a lie detector test is not evidence the person is telling the truth. Correct? OJ was found liable for the deaths of 2 people...

Yup. Do you deem being found liable a sign that somone is innocent? Aren't you getting tired running all these laps? How do you reconcile OJ was acquited criminally and found liable civilly? No benefit to keep doing laps. Sometimes people are so traumatized they are described as “being out of...

I’m not familiar with this character but like Groots 3-word vocabulary. LOL We need AIR the OXYGEN.

Not to start an argument. ;) There is a controversial pastor who wrote a book, I believe called NOT in it to win it. He’s been criticized as being somewhat heretical.

I am Groot.

Another lap.

False. Who died was a convicted felon who went to prison.

I appreciate British humor. Subtle understatements. Many of @amigo de christo’s generic posts are “only a flesh wound” in terms of keeping the conversation on track and focused …

We need to cease from the lie that making generic posts in thread after thread no matter the topic - even though truthful - is edifying. We need AIR the OXYGEN.

We need AIR the OXYGEN.

Yes. Thanks for asking. You are showing your character when you refuse to acknowledge but do laps denying: A jury verdict does not dictate reality.

Yup. You are subordinating reality (metaphysics) to politics. I'm going to type this slow so you might understand it. A jury found OJ "not guilty." This does not mean that he is innocent.

He was found liable in a court based on the preponderance of the evidence.

You are being willfully ignorant of the point; the reaction of the pot being created. It is not God that has to be justified to us; we have to justify ourselves to God. You have too many things fundamentally backwards. So, I'll leave this thread.

It's Jeremiah's potter analogy, isn't it? Paul merely piggy backed on it.

Yes, the condition does prove we can go other way. If we could not go another way, it would be unconditional.