Search results

As if you didn't know. See my post #76. Now, as you are so want to say...answer my questions. Stranger

I got it from this old Book I have called the Bible. (Matt. 25:33) Context. I didn't say God graded on a curve. Stranger

The individuals of the sheep nations are saved. The individuals of the goat nations are not. The sheep nations go into the millennial kingdom, not Heaven, as saved nations and they receive eternal life. The goat nations go into the lake of fire and receive eternal death. This is the time...

P

Phi Run Ltd Pleased to meet you. The significance of Christ finding fault with six of the seven churches to me is that the Church must always guard against error. And the errors described in these churches will always be used of Satan to infiltrate the Church. I believe these churches...

Just answer the questions. Stranger

Take it however you like. There are four questions you have not answered. Your so called 'attack' isn't worth much if you refuse. Stranger

That is your 'opinion'. If individuals are all that are being addressed, then yes. But in (Matt.25:32) it is nations that are being addressed. 'them' speaks to 'nations'. I did answer, you just were not paying attention...and probably didn't want to hear it anyway. Stranger

No, I read it. I just don't put much stock in your 'linguistic evidence'. Smoke mostly. If 'nations' are regarded as 'nations' and 'nations' are separated, how do you say it is individuals? I showed you that 'them' refers back to what was before mentioned. 'nations'. Stranger

Yes, 'them'. Them who? Them nations. I did answer, you apparently didn't catch it. We are talking about saved nations and nations that are not saved. Ask me again. Stranger

No, you wouldn't love to answer my question. The answer is easy. You simply pick certain phrases of what I said instead of the whole sentence. Why? Some call it 'not paying attention to context'. Some call it 'cherry picking'. Some call it 'deceptive and lying'. I don't know which it is...

It's painful...I know. Stranger

No, I have said and still say the word is 'them', not 'people'. And 'them' refer to the 'nations' which were previously mentioned. That is why it is so translated 'them'. You say in post #182 for me to do my 'linguistic homework'. So, I present it. Then you say, 'cherry picking is never...

I'll be...sure is the same word. What a coincidence. Seems like those in (Rom.1:32) had a full knowledge of God's judgement. Didn't do anything for them, did it? Likewise, those in (2 Peter 2:19-21), had a full knowledge, which only benefited them in cleaning up their outward acts. Such...

Not at all. 'Thayers Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament' says of 'AUTOS', " In itself it signifies nothing more than again, applied to what has either been previously mentioned or, when the whole discourse is looked at, must necessarily be supplied." (p.85, copyright 1978) And what...

Thank you. As I said, which you show, 'they have a knowledge but they are not saved'. And, 'they had a knowledge but were not believers'. Knowledge alone does not make a believer. See (Rom.1:32) " Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death...

The word 'them' speaks to 'nations'. The word 'people' is not there. Stranger

No, not wrong. The response I gave was not to you. And I'm waiting for your response to my post #170. Again, the word 'people' is not there. The word 'nations' and 'them' which refers to the nations is there. I know, you're big with the 'buzz words' such as 'denial'. But, as...

Please pay attention. My response here was not to you. But just to answer...I have shown you in the Bible where God will judge according to the 'nations'. You just don't believe it. You add the word 'people'. Scripture says 'nations'. My response to you was post #170. Still waiting your...

m