Search results

Reposted: The outline of the 70 weeks: Dan.9[24] Seventy weeks 1. are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, 2. to finish the transgression, and 3. to make an end of sins, and 4. to make reconciliation for iniquity, and 5. to bring in everlasting righteousness, and 6. to seal up the...

Uh, yes I DID! You just can't escape or let go of your indoctrination. Thank you for the discussion also.

I fully explained and proved the reasoning of that error. If you can't accept it, then know that you will be battling with your own indoctrination. As I did say, Please go and read it

Maccabees is HISTORY! Ask any Jew!

The word "one" is an insertion in the TR Greek. Saying "the lawless" is factually in the plural. Saying "the lawless [one]" is assumed in the singular.

Wrong choice of words. Antichrist as you understand the term, is not written in 2 Thes. 2

Absolutely yes! I (Earburner) don't need to appeal to anything but the Bible (KJV) and accurate history (and Maccabees, written BY the Jews, confirmed by their feast of Hanukkah) to prove my eschatology.

How many are there, in the words "the natural man"? One, or billions?

You wrote: Dude, if you choose to continue believing Jesuit lies after you've been shown the truth about where Futurism and Preterism came from and why they were sent into the world, then I can't help you. I'll pray for you :) . >Hi Phoneman, I replied to your post, of which I took it that you...

The outline of the 70 weeks: Dan.9[24] Seventy weeks 1. are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, 2. to finish the transgression, and 3. to make an end of sins, and 4. to make reconciliation for iniquity, and 5. to bring in everlasting righteousness, and 6. to seal up the...

Can you pronounce the word S-H-A-M? OK, now back to reality! I hope that you all have read 1 Maccabees, in conjunction with the angel's interpretations in Daniel! And remember, don't mix the visions with the interpretations, as you study BTW, with the purposeful errors of 2 Thes. 2, NOW you know...

Now back to 2 Thes. 2:3 There are still more problems with the word "that" and "the" . In the KJV, verse 3 we read: "that" man of sin... But in the TR Greek, the word "the" is used! Thus saying: "the" man of sin... . Now to prove out the error of the translators, why doesn't the KJV stay with...

"The natural man" IS "that man of sin, the son of perdtion" .

Oh, and BTW, should we read that in the singular, or the plural?? I already KNOW!

You don't understand too deeply. Every person who hath not the Holy Spirit of God, IS NONE OF HIS. Rom. 8:9 So then, if the Spirit of God isn't dwelling within a person, then who is? Ans. "The natural man" 1 Cor. 2:14

Davy wrote: All you did was prove something equivalent to ink on a page in The Bible. You didn't stay with the actual context and subject of the 2 Thess.2 chapter, and that's the cardinal sin you made. > What?? The context of all of 2 Thes. chapter 2, IS IN THE PLURAL. Read all of it! . So...

So why do you make the words "the natural man" to be in the plural? In the Greek, the word "the" in 1 Cor. 2:14 Is an insertion, as is the word "that" in 2 Thes. 2:8- "that" Wicked. How much do you want to ignore the fact, that BOTH 1 Cor. 2:14 and 2 Thes. 2:8 ARE to be read and understood in...

I repeat: Error: "then that lawless one will be revealed... Correct: "then the lawless will be revealed.... . Again: the word "that" is not in the TR Greek (Thes. 2:8), but the word "the" is, and should have been used in the 1611 KJV, but IT WASN'T!! . As for the word "one", it is found in the...

Nice try?? I should also state of you. I gave you factual documentation from the TR Greek, and you respond with defending your pet false doctrine? Sorry! There is no comparison!

Ever since Jesus spoke of it Himself, our BODIES ARE the temple of God!!! So, what is wrong with your understanding? Ans. You are leaning unto to your own understanding, through the preconceived concepts of men, no matter how long ago!!