Search results

According to the Textus Receptus Greek,..... IT IS A GROUP of people, and one of a very large size,... as in MANY!! Do associate that with Rom. 8:9 Rom.8[9] But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of...

Yes!! That was clearly THEIR intention! Make SURE that it's read in the singular, and not the plural. Yes they did "pin the tail on the donkey", but I have found out that WE are the donkey. By the way I am a staunch Methodist, and NOT Catholic.

Your welcome! BTW, I study the KJV only. I already gave my testimony of why, here on this thread. I also do understand why the KJV translators were persuaded to write 2 Thes. 2:8 in the manner they did. 1611 was not far from the Protestant Reformation. Ahh...now we can see the bigger picture of...

SG wrote: However, the context is referring to the lawless [one]. So, it seems that whether ‘that’ or ‘the’ doesnt do damage to the meaning of the passage. > Well, you be the judge, by dropping the inserted word [one] And use the correct pronoun of "the", and then make the comparison yourself...

The INSERTED word "that", was purposely done, so that the reader would understand that the words are to be read in the singular. However, in the Textus Receptus Greek, no such error, insertion or implication exists for the word "that". Instead, the word "the" is used, and by that single correct...

The CORRECT Greek word for "that" IS "the" . The Greek word "wicked" has the word "one" under it in brackets- [ ]. Any word that is in brackets is an insertion. Therefore, when correctly read, as the Textus Receptus Greek reveals, those words "that Wicked", as found in the KJV are erroneous...

Even the word "one" is in brackets [one], which is showing that it is also an insertion.

2 Thessalonians 2:8 Greek Text Analysis

I realize that most people can't/won't accept that 2 Thes. 2:8 is an insertion by the translators. I provided the means whereby one can search it for themselves. It's not "that Wicked" , but rather "the wicked" in the Textus Receptus Greek (KJV). See my prev. Posts on that. There no longer any...

bbyrd009 wrote: "...After his death his empire too destabilized and formed four lesser successors that continued to battle each other." > I am assuming that you are referring to Alex The Great. Correct?

"Post reply" is in the wrong place on my screen!! It's too close to where I am typing!! It seems the site builders never get that straightened out! Here is any idea for preventing the accidental sending of posts: put in a caution screen that says: "Are you sure you want to send?"

Why didn't you do tha Why didn't you do that in the first place?

?? Is the above an error, being a combination of posts, from 3 different posters? It doesn't make sense!

No. But does the Son? Might be the Q there You are questioning if God the Son has iniquity?? . You better back up quickly, and retract that question! It may be, that not many Christians will want to talk to you, if you really think/believe that the Lord Jesus had/has sin within Himself.

I am pleased to see you using the KJV. Unfortunately, you have a very poor understanding of the angel Gabriel's interpretation, given to Daniel. . Did you know that 1 Maccabees goes hand and hand with Daniel, and that Revelations has little to do with Daniel? In fact, virtually all of Daniel was...

Some Christians live in "Religious Fantasy Land" all their lives, hurling "religious speak" back and forth, talking through the imagination of their minds, according to what the "religious, scholarly learned" says is so. Fact #1- there is no "little horn" in Revelations, of whom the...

It appears that you are grouping random scriptures, stringing them along together, so that you can say what YOU want it to say. The KJV wrecks your purposeful manipulation: Ezek.18 [19] Yet say ye, Why? doth not the son bear the iniquity of the father? When the son hath done that which is lawful...

?? Where? Thanks for being unhelpful.

Absolutely 100% correct!

Location of scripture please.