Search results

Let's get beyond grammar punctuation, shall we!

What you are speaking, is all their religious, regurgitated false doctrine, from the "scholarly learned" of "church-ianity". We ARE NOT to be " guided" by them and their religious commentators! We are to be guided by His Holy Spirt, who shall guide us INTO ALL truth. John 16:13. See also Isa...

I have been speaking about that on this thread. Please read the KJV only. 2 Thes. Ch. 2 is to be read in the plural, just as we read and understand that the words "the natural man" is read and understood in the plural. The context of 2 Thes. 2 is in the plural. "The natural man" (the unsaved...

When you associate the correct "he" to verse 27, you will then understand that it was Jesus who "confirmed the covenant with many for one week". Do the math of when Jesus was "cut off" (crucified) in the midst of that week. That's 3.5 years, which is the time from his Baptism to His...

No it does not!! Your thinking goes that way because of the false indoctrination the churches pound into our heads. As I have said before, there is no such thing as a one man band, singular man, to come, that the churches love to call "THE" Antichrist. "That spirit of antichrist", yes, but not...

Yes, I agree that it is offensive to think about, but it was by the sacrifice of Christ Himself that CAUSED the temple sacrifices and oblation to cease! He Jesus, is that "he" of Daniel 9 [26] And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the...

Not all of Israel is Israel. However out of each generation, a remnant are saved, through faith in Jesus Christ. Surely you do know that. Israel as a nation, became equal to all the Gentile nations in 70AD.

No, that is not what happened to Jerusalem, according to the 70 week prophecy in Daniel. Here is a clue: 70AD.

Yes, the temple was "destroyed" (the AoD) and then it was "restored" by Judas Maccabeus. Does that sound prophetic in any manner, to that of Christ Himself? They "destroyed" His temple, and then He "restored" it through His Resurrection. John 2: 19-21 Is any wonder how Jesus meant it when he...

And the Mormons, JWs and the Pentecostal? They are OK?

And nothing important happened to Jerusalem, according to the 70 weeks?

And the SDAs are not the same?? When shall you learn that all of "church-ianity" is the same as the Mother- Jerusalem! They do what the Mother did.

You misunderstand. No one is born with eternal life or existence of any kind. Rom. 8:9 says plainly that "whosoever hath not the Spirit of God, aka the Spirit of Christ, the Holy Spirit, he is none of His." Judas died BEFORE the Day of Pentecost. On the other hand, Peter didn't die, but lived on...

Regardless of what you think of the RCC, they do teach Christ Crucified, resurrected from the dead, Ascended into Heaven bodily, and shall return in like manner. The Mother OF Harlots was "Jerusalem that now is". Even today "Jerusalem" will not accept "her" Savior, the Lord Jesus!

1&2- AE of the Hellenistic Seleucid Empire is most assuredly the little horn. The 3rd Beast began with Alex the Great, and ended with the 4 horns, which clearly shows it to be "in the latter time of their kingdom" (Grecian-3rd beast). KJV-Dan. 8:23. "Their kingdom" was the 3rd beast. 3. Wrong...

Enoch 111 wrote: "That is a fanciful interpretation. The prophecy speaks of Messiah being cut off, but not for Himself. Which is a reference to the crucifixion. The time between the decree of Cyrus and the crucifixion was 483 years (69 weeks). There is absolutely nothing about Christ's baptism...

Of course, anyone who feels threatened to think beyond the wall of their doctrines of church-ianity, is going to consider christ-ianity to be cultish. "There can always be more than one lie, but there can never be more than one truth"- Earburner

Get some "thick skin" and move on with the topic at hand. No one is shouting at anyone. By this site's permission, we have punctuating highlights above, to emphasize our words. If that's shouting to you, then go find shelter.

Understand Rom. 8:9 first, and then you will know why Judas was "none of His".

Correct! By the words of " the natural man"- 1Cor. 2:14, I did give you the symbolism of how to interpret the words "that man of sin, the son of perdition". Unfortunately, you are not taking the time to make the association, and would rather teach me with your preconceived, religious...