Search results

kepha31 Concerning your post #124... sounds good. Stranger

Indeed. In reply #123 you said Dec. 25th 'wasn't' His birthday. But it may well have been. So, you don't know that it wasn't. Yes, we are not instructed to observe Christ's birthday. But the wisemen and shepherds did. And why wouldn't we? Arey you telling me you don't get off work for...

Then tell me when Christ's birthday was. So that you can worship Him correctly and I also. My kids knew of Santa Clause. They knew it was a cultural thing. They knew the meaning of Christmas was Jesus Christ. How is me and mine, recognizing a day to celebrate the birth and resurrection of...

No, but we let them hunt easter eggs. They knew about Santa but we didn't demonize him. They knew that Christmas was about Jesus Christ. You are always going to have people in the world who are not believers. They put their own take on the holiday. That doesn't mean that it removes my...

To any evolutionists who are here; If evolution were true, and animals changed and adapted according to survival in the elements, why would they leave their fur and feathers, which provide much better for them then the bare skin of man? And, where did the shame come from in being naked in...

FHI When I allowed my kids to hunt easter eggs, I was not worshipping another god. They were not encouraged to worship another god. All they knew about Easter is that it was the time when Christ rose from the dead. The same with Christmas. The tree was simply part of the Christmas holiday...

StanJ I discussed the authors use of the term 'arbitrarily' and how I believe he was mistaken. I explained why. How is that out of context? If you don't want to discuss it that's fine. Stranger

I was clear in what I said. I asked you, where am I out of context. Simple question. Stranger

StanJ This is why I don't like 'links' instead of ones own statements. Now you say your confused. Ok. I stated what I did based on John Henry's statements. Which you apparently agree with. All I can say is you can disagree with what I said and then make your own arguments as to why...

StanJ Well, as I said, I don't hold to 'limited atonement', but the other points I pretty much agree with. I'm sure there are hyper-calvinists who have points I would disagree with also. But, even if I did hold to all five points, I think John Henry is mistaken in saying it makes God's...

And does your character measure up to God's? I'm sure yours is better than mine, but I am not the one to compare to. Stranger

StanJ The only point I disagree on is that of 'limited atonement'. Why do you say in Calvinism God chooses arbitrarily? Stranger

There are things wrong within the Roman Church. There are things wrong within the Protestant Church. The Roman Churches original base is the Church at Rome. The one who Paul wrote to in his epistle to the Romans. Whose faith was known through out the whole world. The Roman faith is not...

Ok. I enjoy the deep and exploring conversations with others as much as I do the prattle with you. Stranger

Howdy Pleased to meet ya. Stranger

Enjoy your 'ready rolls'. Stranger

"without meaning to'... meaning I didn't say it but you are saying it. Yes, you would have been better served. Stranger

As I said, you know as much about David as you do Job. Indeed, God is concerned as to who you are, more than what you do. Stranger

That 'real tobacco' sounds like another subject. Stranger

You called David a murderer and adulterer. God never did. God called David a 'man after his own heart'. (1 Sam. 13:14) " ...the LORD hath sought him a man after his own heart,..." (1 Sam. 16:12) " And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and...