Search results

I thought you used common sense when interpreting scripture? There is no common sense in believing that some of the lost will be resurrected 1,000+ years after the rest of the lost. That is not taught anywhere in scripture. Jesus certainly did not teach that. John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for...

LOL. So, we should be looking out for a literal beast with seven literal heads and ten literal horns? I mean, that's what the text says. You apparently think that if we don't take something as literally as possible then we are adding to the scripture. To be consistent this means you should...

David, I've told you this a few times before but you never "listen". Amils do not deny what it means when it says "no more". We believe that Satan can deceive the nations no more during the thousand years. The difference between how Amils interpret Revelation 20 and how Premils interpret it has...

Why do you have to say stupid things like "Why can't Amils use at least use some common sense before concluding how something should be interpreted?". Your "common sense" is what Paul calls "man's wisdom", which "the natural man" relies on and causes him to see God's word and the things of the...

LOL. I see that you are making about the same amount of headway with him as I have (none), so does that mean you are not making your point as effectively as could be or is it just impossible to get him to understand how we Amils understand Satan's binding and what it means for him to deceive the...

Well, it doesn't feel very good when that happens, does it? LOL. You are pretending as if you know what I believe more than I do, which is a complete joke. No, you do not. This is a huge waste of time. Just believe whatever you want, but please stop acting as if you understand what I believe...

I am suggesting no such thing. Not at all. You proved once again that you do not understand my view. Just accept that and stop trying to speak for me. You just end up misrepresenting what I believe over and over again. You, in contrast, seem to act as if Satan having the power of death meant...

It's not talking about an ongoing gathering, it's talking about the elect being gathered when Jesus comes, just like Paul wrote about in 1 Thesslonians 4:14-17.. You try to twist the text to fit your false preterist doctrine. You have some gall trying to tell other people they are using bad...

I'm done with this. Your claims of bad exegesis on my part are ludicrous. Your exegesis is HORRIBLE because you do not take ALL of scripture into account when interpreting the Olivet Discourse, which is very unwise on your part. That question has nothing to do with my point. I was simply...

You're not reading what I'm saying carefully at all. I'm saying that is what binds Satan. The preaching of the gospel of Christ and His death and resurrection through the power of the Holy Spirit is what keeps Satan from preventing the word of God to be preached throughout the world as he was...

The Luke 21 passage has heaven and earth passing away when Jesus returns, just like 2 Peter 3:10-12. So, that clearly supports Amil. Neither the Isaiah 24 passage nor the Revelation 19 passage say anything about any mortals surviving His return. Where does verse 22 say anything about mortal...

I'm mocking your ridiculous interpretation of the Bible. I will not delete it. The image of the beast is the opposite of the image of Christ. We (His people) are conformed to the image of Christ. Romans 8:29 For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son...

Sure. And you acknowledge that you're not talking about the abomination of desolation being set up on the temple mount of the dome of the rock, but rather of a temple that does not currently exist, yes?

The Greek empire with Alexander the Great as its king which took its place in power after taking down the Media-Persian empire. Daniel 8:5 And as I was considering, behold, an he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and touched not the ground: and the goat had a notable horn...

Is that what you were talking about? No. I'm pretty sure you're not talking about the abomination of desolation being set up on the temple mount of the dome of the rock. You're talking about it being set up on the temple mount of a temple that will almost certainly never exist.

Ah, yes. It will somehow be set up on the temple mount of a supposed future temple that almost certainly will never exist. That's quite a weak argument.

No, I've seen what you posted and it's total nonsense. Sorry to be the one to inform you of that. And that is definitely not my problem at all. It's only yours.

Or perhaps yours is a tad off? But, it appears that you agree with me that the symbolic woman does not sit on literal things? The many waters and the beast she sits on (Rev 17:1,3) are obviously not literal.

LOL. Of course you would see it that way because of your extreme doctrinal bias. You don't think anyone can say right now whether or not they will experience the second death? Do you think the dead in Christ do not yet know if they will experience the second death or not? Does the second death...