Search results

All flesh on earth? Why did Jesus only say that those who are in Judea needed to flee then? You are turning a local tribulation event into a global tribulation event to make scripture fit your doctrine. You never just look at scripture objectively. You're always manipulating it to say whatever...

How about looking at all of scripture and making sure you don't contradict any other scripture while interpreting the Olivet Discourse? Looks like you forgot to do that in your supposed exegesis of the text. Jesus did not come in any way, shape or form in 70 AD and the elect were not gathered in...

You're not living in reality then. Spiritually. He didn't say we would never die physically. Please join us in reality. Yes, his soul and spirit went to heaven with Christ after his bodily death. But, he did die physically/bodily and will be bodily resurrected in the future when Christ...

What are you referring to exactly when you refer to Christians returning in their glorified body? Christians will all be changed and then have glorified bodies when He returns at the last trumpet (1 Corinthians 15:50-54), but what evidence do you have that the thousand year reign is future?

It's not there, of course. Of the MANY weak arguments that pre-tribs make, that might be at the top of the list. To equate John being taken to heaven or being given a vision of heaven with a pre-trib rapture is the biggest stretch of scripture imaginable. It's complete, utter nonsense.

People are still dying, so your view can't be taken seriously at all. Are you a full preterist?

Well, your HONEST opinion is 100% wrong and makes no sense. There is NOTHING blasphemous about the Amill doctrine. That is ridiculous nonsense. You're the only Premill in the world who would accuse Amill of not giving Christ enough credit for what He has done and for who He is now. We say that...

This is utter foolishness. I will not stop supporting Amillennialism which is NOT blasphemous at all. That is a LIE! Amillennialism is the doctrine that puts Jesus on the pedestal above all things right NOW where He belongs. Premillennialism (as most understand it) is the view that denigrates...

No one cares how long you have been a preacher. It just means you have been preaching falsehood, such as the pre-trib rapture, for a long time.

You have your own brand of Premil. Where did Paul ever teach your brand of Premil (or any form of it, really)? I don't see anywhere where he taught that many of the dead who are resurrected will then live on the earth for a long time while being tested.

Do you then see the reference to the dead in Christ being resurrected in 1 Thessalonians 4:16 as the second resurrection with the resurrection of only those who were beheaded as being the first resurrection? When giving the order of bodily resurrections unto immortality in 1 Corinthians...

Exactly. People who believe in a future individual Antichrist just ignore verses like those.

You need to ask yourself how the second death has no power over those who are alive and remain until the second coming of Christ. I believe Revelation 20:6 indicates that one must have part in the first resurrection in order for the second death to not have power over them. Tell me, does the...

Stop being a fool! I was doing no such thing. You have no reading comprehension skills whatsoever. Stop trying to speak for me when you have no understanding of what I believe! Never did I say that someone who is born again does not need to have faith until the end. My point is that all...

LOL. This is pure nonsense. You cannot be taken seriously. You're not worth my, or anyone else's, time.

So, you disagree with Paul who said in Romans 11:22 that Gentiles can be broken off? As always, I'm going to side with scripture over you.

In no way, shape or form is my view "a denigration of what the sacrifice and blood of Christ has accomplished for us.". That statement is foolish. It's quite the opposite. You do not understand why he was bound. It has nothing to do with completely incapacitating Satan, it has to do with Jesus...

In Matthew 16:28 Jesus was talking about His transfiguration which is described immediately following that verse. He gave some of the disciples standing there (Peter, James and John) a foreshadowing of His future coming in glory with His angels, that He referenced in Matthew 16:27, by being...

Why is it inappropriate? I asked you a question and did not say you were doing that. Would you rather I accuse you of doing that instead of asking? You've never seen any of his many rude posts? That seems impossible, but if that's what you claim, I'll take your word for it. Nope. Not really.

You can see how clueless he is about what others believe when he tries to claim that someone believes that Noah was delivered post-flood and Lot was delivered post-fire. No one believes that. But, what he's missing is what you pointed out here, which is that the same day Noah entered the ark...