Search results

What is the WEAKEST root of the Catholic tree? I would love to discuss it with you and hear what you think. Patient Mary

Yes, I do care. Thank you for your opinion on epistemological roots. Mary

Hi Nancy, Yes, I do realize that Satan had his talons within the Church from the beginning. Are you suggesting that the historical Christian writings we have from the 1st and 2nd Century Christians are a product of the Anti-Christ? (The Didache, Clement of Rome, Ignatius, Polycarp etc) Yes, I...

OK.....You deny Sola Scriptura. That takes you one step closer to being Catholic. What other beliefs/practices do you hold that Protestants hold? It might be easier if you just tell me what church you belong to.... Curious Mary

Jane....Yes you are....!!! Protestant defined: a member of any of several church denominations denying the universal authority of the Pope and affirming the Reformation principles of justification by faith alone, the priesthood of all believers, and the primacy of the Bible as the only source...

Hey dodgeball, you still didn't answer my questions. Maybe @Nancy can help you out since she likes your post?

Hi BL, Who do YOU rely upon for your teachings regarding faith and practice? BTW....Your confession of Faith is typically Protestant soooooo we are back to square one. Why does YOUR confession of the Protestant faith trump my confession of the Catholic faith??? Curious Mary

Hi Jane, You get onto your knees and ask God about XYZ. He then gives you an answer that you think is THE RIGHT ANSWER about XYZ. Fast forward 50 years, 1,000 years or even 2,000 years......according to your theory it doesn't matter what God told you......Your "historical account" should be...

Got it.....You are unable to quote ANYTHING from Scripture that shows that infants were or were not baptized....That's ok....Neither can I. HOWEVER infants are a part of FAMILIES that were baptized and scripture does say that entire families were baptized so the evidence weighs more toward...

Yup....and your personal opinion (which is not a personal opinion) is opposite of other peoples personal opinion (which is not a personal opinion) but your personal opinion (which is not a personal opinion) is right because you have context and they don't.......o_Oo_Oo_O Sooooo which "personal...

Yes you did twist my words. Here is what I said: Your "symbol" teaching is about 500 years old. DO YOU RECALL WHAT YOU ACCUSED ME OF SAYING????? Patient Mary

Hey dodgeball you didn't answer my questions: Do you think there were any "infants" in a household in the 1st Century? Why are you refusing to let Jesus children come to Him when the NT Christians practiced opposite of your opinion? If the CC is not The Church then which Church is The Church...

Right.....;) It's not your personal opinion? Is that because God talked to you directly??? o_O Which "believers" are you talking about? Anyone that agrees with YOU???? Soooooo if I don't agree with what YOU and your ilk believe....I am a non-believer??? fascinating....:rolleyes: That makes...

Yes you did twist my words. Here is what I said: QUOTE: Your "symbol" teaching is about 500 years old. Stop being dishonest....

Thank you. I agree with you.....You have much to learn.

Thank you for your opinion. I find it fascinating that you think your beliefs are valid/true/reliable etc. since they are the result of YOUR thorough study of scripture , YOU speaking with God, and some pondering of misc information....but no one in history ESPECIALLY the CC can sway you on...

It is infallibly true that there is no infallible Truth? It seems to me that is what you are saying.....

Yup....Post #435 was real constructive....;) I am not upset that you are not Catholic.....How did you come up with that false belief? When was I snarky??? You showed no respect in post #435....IMO Mary

Neither is trolling and sniping..... You said that you TRY your best to be constructive, respectful, and reply to what's actually being talked about in a thread. Since you were NONE of those (constructive, respectful) and you did not reply to what was actually being talked about in the thread...

You said that you are versed in the correct methodology at getting at the truth. You then said If 1,000 say the say thing I am getting concrete evidence. I have used your own theory to come to a conclusion and that conclusion shows how ridiculous your theory is. And this is the best response...