Search results

Here is what he said: He was not saying that verses 6, 13, 14 have a dual fulfillment, he was saying he thinks those verses have a different context than the end of the age when Jesus comes. So, he sees those verses as only relating to 70 AD and not the end of the age.

What scripture can you use to help support this interpretation? What kingdom was inherited in 70 AD? You can't say the kingdom of God. Believers were already in the kingdom of God spiritually before that by way of being born again. Uh huh. I'm doing the first one. With bias. I'm not doing...

That verse has nothing to do with the new heaven and new earth, but rather with each individual who is in Christ being made new spiritually.

So, Satan is just up the sky hanging out in the same place at all times? That doesn't seem to match the description of Satan in the Bible. Was it a star in the sky who was tempting Jesus in the desert for 40 days and nights?

LOL. No offense, but you were no help at all. You first misrepresented my view. I then corrected you with what I actually said. You then said what I actually said was false doctrine and that is what I was saying. I was saying that the view I was describing was false. And you agree.

Right. The Lamb doesn't have two brides. But, right now the church is not all together in one place like it will be when God brings heaven together with earth without any separation between the two any longer. That's what Rev 21 is about.

The heavenly Jerusalem is not a literal city with a literal location. It's a symbolic representation of the new covenant church. Galatians 4:22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the...

I have bothered and I showed you and you ignore it. So, tell me what tense "WAS ESTABLISHED" is in? Hebrews 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises. 7 For if that first covenant...

Where does Rev. 19 say anything about the Lord stepping foot on the earth?

It has a lot of detail, so it's quite strange that it would say nothing about Satan at all if it has to do with the same thing as Revelation 20. But, why do you not apply this same concept to other scripture like 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17 and Matthew 24:29-31? You try to say that they that they...

LOL. You're being very dishonest here. It would take not much more time than it took you to make that post. Why can't you be honest and admit that you either made it up that he agreed with you or that you misunderstood what he said. He clearly does not agree with you as he has confirmed twice now.

Right. That's what I was saying. LOL.

That is easily resolved by looking at Matthew 13:38 to see that the tares are not children of His kingdom and only the wheat are children of His kingdom and by looking at this similar parable: Matthew 13:47 “Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and...

When do you plan on showing us where covenantee "agreed with the Holy Scripture that is dual prophecy = smart thing to do!!!"? It can't be hard to find if he actually said that.

What is described in Zechariah 14 does not match what is described in Revelation 20. Why would Zechariah make no mention of Satan's binding or Satan's little season if it relates directly to the same time period as Revelation 20? Satan's binding and loosing are a major part of Revelation 20.

What rewards were given in 70 AD? Nope. exegesis (noun): critical explanation or interpretation of a text, especially of scripture. So, exegesis simply refers to the interpretation of scripture. That's what I'm doing. Comparing scripture with scripture is not eisegesis. To see that it talks...

lol

Do not ask me dumb questions. As if I'm going to say that Jesus was in error? His parables contained references to fictional people, places and events that represented real people, places and events. Luke 16:19-31 does not that description. If it's a parable, it's unlike any of His other...

There is a lot of detail in Zechariah 14, but nothing about Satan's little season? Why not? Why would you believe in future animal sacrifices when Jesus made animal sacrifices obsolete by His "once for all sacrifice" (Hebrews 10:1-14)? What would be the purpose of these supposed future animal...

No, you will not find it. It doesn't exist.