Search results

That is a lie. Symbols symbolize reality.

I don't. How could I be talking to you if you were on my Ignore list? I obviously am reading your posts. If you were on my Ignore list I wouldn't see your posts.

I'm not aware of any such site. I'm talking about what I have seen people say in the past on forums like this and to me in person. If you don't want to believe that, then that's your problem.

@Davidpt Do you have any thoughts on what I said here? It seems like there are many times when I address one of your arguments and then you never respond back.

I asked which verses you think have a dual fulfillment, so please answer that question. He said some things that related to each of those churches specifically and some things that applied to all churches then and from that point on. But, there is nothing He said that had a specific fulfillment...

No offense, but I couldn't care less what you find to be convincing. It is described as "the bride, the Lamb's wife" (Rev 21:9). If you want to think that a literal city is Christ's bride, then I can't stop you.

Not even close. Forget it, man. This is hopeless. Let's move on.

What is the point? Clearly, there is some symbolism in the book of Revelation. No one denies that. There is disagreement over how much. Are you claiming otherwise or what?

This is something I hope all of us here can agree on. With that said, I do hope you are able to fish during that time. It's eternity, so I think you'll have time for it. LOL.

You are a stubborn one. I have seen and heard the comments of pretribs who do not believe the tribulation begins at the beginning of the 70th week, but rather begins a bit after that or at the midpoint. So, you can't tell me otherwise. It's a minority view among pretribs, but some have it.

Haha. I dont need to do that because I don't see Zechariah 14 as being directly related to Revelation 20. You should do that.

Not looking to argue because we already agreed that we can't fully imagine it. But, in my view, fishing will seem not very interesting to you compared to what God has in store for us. Just my opinion. Set your expectations higher is all I'm saying. But, I'm with you that I can't wait. Looking...

Not overall, I'm not. I say Rev 21 happens in the future, but a full preterist does not. Not completely. Not even close to what I believe, overall. Read everything I say, not just a few words here and there.

LOL. I don't recall names offhand, but it's a view I have seen. I am not saying it's the typical view. I just thought I'd point out that there are other pre-trib views since you came across as if there was only one. I have no interest in discussing this any further.

Why are you not looking at the other verses for context?! Who did Jesus say are in His kingdom? The wheat. Not the tares. Matthew 13:38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; What kingdom did Jesus reference...

We can speculate, but I am glad that we can't imagine it with our limited minds. That would be disappointing. It will be better than anything we can imagine, in my opinion. We will not be disappointed. I'm sure you would agree with that.

Doug, was I debating this? No, I was not. You don't need to tell me things like this. You completely wasted your time. I was simply pointing out that there are other pre-trib views besides that one. That doesn't seem like tribulation at all, so this is why some pre-tribs do not see the...

Did you actually read all of my post? If you did, you would not be saying this because I see things as happening in the future that full preterists say has already happened, such as Rev 21. My view is very far from full preterism. You misinterpret almost everything I say, so it might be best for...

They are contrasted with the people in the kingdom. That means they are not in Christ's kingdom, but instead are in the evil one's (Satan's) kingdom. No. I showed you what verse 41 means. Did you not see that? I showed this similar parable... Matthew 13:47 “Once again, the kingdom of heaven is...

You are not paying attention to my point. I'm not saying that Zechariah 14 should have all detail. But, it does have a lot of detail, so why no mention of Satan at all when the binding and loosing of Satan is a major part of Revelation 20? Where are you seeing that? The purpose of those were...