Search results

How does this answer the question? Does this mean you're saying that any prophecy that is never explicitly said to have been fulfilled once has a dual fulfillment or could have a dual fulfillment?

Some believe that Matthew 24:15-22 has a future fulfillment rather than being fulfilled in 70 AD because they deny that Luke 21:20-24 is a parallel passage. I have yet to see a convincing argument to explain how the following passages, which are both quoted as being part of the Olivet Discourse...

Thank you. Now, I see that what you called repeating prophecy is what some others call dual fulfillment prophecy. I don't agree with that concept. If we start allowing for repeating or dual prophecies, where does it end? What if someone tries to claim that the prophecy about the Messiah being...

Wow. It's a miracle that you even acknowledge that. But, somehow that significant event is not prophesied in the Bible anywhere? That event was devastating to the Jews and was huge event in the history of the Jews, but there's nothing in the Bible about it? Yes, He spoke of that, but not in the...

I wasn't talking to you. I was addressing David in NJ's claim that the Matthew 24:15-21 passage in particular was a repeating prophecy in the sense that part of it was fulfilled in 70 AD and the rest in the future. I'm trying to find out what he meant by that exactly in terms of which part he...

That is correct. But, when Jesus referred to "the holy place" in the Olivet Discourse, that was before His death so it was still valid to refer to the temple standing at that time as "the holy place" up until the veil of the temple was torn in two when Jesus was crucified. That did not mean it...

Yes, because you've told me 1,000 times. I guess you thought that wasn't enough. No, I disagree with your opinions. I have never said that He returned immediately after a 70 AD great tribulation, so you are lying about what I believe. Why didn't you address my view of this when I explained it...

By saying that it comes across that you're saying you're doing that, but I'm not doing that. You're still not addressing my point. Can you not see that my point relates ONLY to the unjust dead all being resurrected at the same time? Go back and read your post #3 in this thread. You came across...

How do you not know how you came across? You thought that is what I was saying you believe and you basically said that idea, which you thought was coming from me about your belief, was a dumb thing to say. Don't blame me for how you came across. You basically said it would be "dumb" and...

LOL! Who are you trying to fool here? This means you are saying you refuse to admit and agree with what I believe which you say is "something dumb". LOL! You are so dishonest. Here is what else I said in response that you were responding to: You interpretation of what I was saying is that...

Can we just stop with the accusations of cherry picking scripture and all that nonsense already? Let's stop with the insults and just discuss the scriptures. I thought we all came to that agreement in the ECF thread a few days ago? You completely missed the point. Were you not indicating before...

What? That makes no sense whatsoever. Scripture says the better new covenant replaced the old covenant. Why not believe that? Hebrews 8:6 But in fact the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, since the new...

How is the forgiveness of sins a different thing to salvation? Matthew 26:28 For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Read Hebrews 8-10. Do you trust Hebrews 8-10 to be the truth? It says the new covenant has been fulfilled. Why not believe it whether you can fully understand how or not?

You think I'm not addressing part of the parable even though I already said I believe the punishment relates to judgment day and them being cast into the lake of fire rather than to physical destruction in 70 AD. If you disagree, so be it, but I am addressing that part of the parable. You...

So, that's what you're saying about Matthew 24:15-22 (Mark 13:14-20, Luke 21:20-24)? If so, which part of it wascompleted in 70 AD and which part of it wasn't completed then and will be completed in the future?

You need to get your memory checked. This is from one of your past posts in response to me...

Okay, fine. You are ignoring the content of the parable. Is that better?

He will surely take offense at this as he falsely thinks that "hearsay" is the same as heresy.

Agree. No evidence has been shown to suggest that Abraham's bosom is/was paradise. Meanwhile, we have scripture which says that the spirit of the thief on the cross went to paradise with Jesus the day they died (Luke 23:43) and that paradise is the third heaven (2 Cor 12:2-4). So, it's easy to...