Search results

Scott, who do you imagine is reading all of these posts? I'm not. I know my posts are what spawned all these posts. You are wasting your time. No one is reading these. You are not addressing anything I said specifically, so I'm not going to bother reading and addressing your posts, either.

Nice job of twisting his words. I can't take you seriously. Paul was speaking in the context of what would happen immediately upon departing his body.

The next time you make a convincing argument to back up your Premill view will be the first time. You're all about eisegesis with no exegesis.

As I said would be the case. Yep. Right. I'm fine with just agreeing to disagree on this. But, this doesn't mean I won't talk about this topic with other people if it comes up.

It seems to me that Jesus is clearly only talking about what happens physically to the one taken and one left when He comes because He talks about that in the same context of what happened with the flood in Noah's day and what happened in Sodom in Lot's day. So, I don't think He had in mind what...

Notice that he doesn't even attempt to address what I said in the original post. Very telling.

Did you read my post or not? You are not specifically addressing anything I said. No, the two men are not the same. It's talking about one being bodily taken up to meet the Lord in the air and the other being left behind and killed, as I pointed out.

I have made this same point to him several times and he just doesn't get it. The same word translated as "many" in Daniel 12:2 is used here... Genesis 21:33 And Abraham planted a grove in Beersheba, and called there on the name of the Lord, the everlasting God. 34 And Abraham sojourned in the...

You are by far the most delusional person I've ever come across. Your arguments are extremely weak but you think you are making irrefutable arguments. LOL! Hilarious! What in the world are you even saying here? When those who belong to Christ are gathered to Him in the air that is shortly...

I don't mean to offend, but I find this to be a cop out response that is typical of Calvinism. Scripture has a great deal to say about salvation, but somehow nothing about how salvation is determined by God? I don't buy it. Do you also say that it's a mystery as to why God punishes unbelievers...

You are an immature child. Were you raised by wolves? Christ's sheep are His followers, as He Himself taught in John 10. They include Jewish believers (His first fold) and Gentile believers (His other fold). Very simple. Yet, still too complex for a child like you to understand. Consider...

LOL. What a delusional clown.

Can you expand on this? What does this mean exactly? Is this one of those mysteries that Calvinism teaches? Somehow, God decided not to reveal to us how He determines who He would save and who He would condemn to hell with no opportunity to be saved? We just have to trust He has His reasons that...

I evade nothing. I already addressed your arguments, so don't lie and say otherwise. You just don't like how I refute your weak arguments. You act like a clown here. How can I take you seriously? Talk about evading. I point out how Jesus thought of people as being in two groups when He said "He...

I don't find any of this to be convincing. Please tell me how you interpret this passage (compare Luke 17:37 to Matthew 24:28): Luke 17:26 “Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man. 27 People were eating, drinking, marrying and being given in marriage...

Why didn't you make that clear then, buddy? You only asked about my understanding of WHEN these things would take place. You need to take a class on how to communicate. They are literal, physical events. Jesus was making the point that it would not be literal, physical events that would show...

Address my points specifically, bro. You are not doing that..again. You are not specifically addressing even one thing I said in my post. What exactly did I say that you are saying no to? Quote it and tell me how you interpret the passages I was referring to. Are you disagreeing that the passage...

Yes, because the thousand years takes place on this earth and it says in Revelation 21:1 that the new earth appears after this earth passes away. Revelation 21:1 Then I saw “a new heaven and a new earth,”[a] for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any...

Haha. Very true. I have noticed that most Premills here need to take an English course to learn the meanings of English words. They think the words "fact" and "opinion" are synonyms. They are completely confused.

He thinks He is God or at least was appointed to speak for God. He needs to be humbled. I suggest he humble himself before God has to do it.