Search results

This shows your questions are not those if an intellectual nature but intended to persuade. The truth does not matter to you, only advancing your ideology. Make A Blessed Day!

If that's true, why did Jesus say we should fear the One who can destroy our soul?

Sure you can! Why else would Christ give us the Great Commission if we could not save people? AGENCY.

What post did I say this?

My question reveals great wisdom. And you answered correctly, both saved you. It does fit because one saved through the other. This is agency. Just yesterday I saw another headline talking about why Hitler killed so many Jews. Actually, he killed no one. We use the notion of agency today...

To say there is purpose to evil is not to deny it is evil.

You already stated? What there is to talk about is the subject you keep ignoring. For some reason, you are self-centered in this exchange, focusing only on what you say, ignoring the point @Hobie made of what Jesus said. Jesus continually held up the commandments. The lord of heaven and earth...

Sorry AJ, I miscommunicated. I was referring to the talking points from the other side - not anything you wrote.

I am not saying anything like that but what Jesus said. Jesus continually upheld the commandments. Seems you do t want to talk about that. Make a Blessed Day!

This is my thread and I already answered your first question that you asked without answering my question. ‘Conversation’ over.

Doubling down on not answering. Gotcha!

Is there a link?

True but doubling down on what is not relevent is for what purpose? Jesus continually upheld the commandments for us to obey. Simple.

So, rather than answer the question, you go right to Ad Hom, then claim AJ has bad manners. Yikes!

I'm glad you asked. This exchange shows reading comprehensive problems, not limited to religious theology. There is a proper interpretation and it hinges on people' confusing the adverb continuously with what verb it modifies. What is continuously referring to in @Hobie's sentence? A. Us...

The back door attempts to rationaliza a flawed doctrine are so funny. Some things are absolute, not relative or a matter of degree. What is received is blessing, honor and glory. The passage does not speak of degrees because these are absolute. So, you have to read into the verse "same" to...

Whoever God commands. I believe it was Ravens who brought food to Elisha, fish with a coin to Jesus, an animal skin for Adam and Eve, Ananias was brought to touch Paul’s eyes so he could see, a dove brought an olive twig to Noah, etc. Now, you know you cannot answer a question with a question...

I do not get the ‘he did not refuse’ worship assertion for it builds a case based on negation while simultaneously ignoring explicit and positive text such as Luke 4:5-8, as you pointed out. It’s like what Jesus said is not important, what he did NOT do is important. Huh? That can only make...

Blessing, and honour, and glory - not worship, right?

No. OF God not is God. Learn English yourself.