Search results

Right. He is blatantly changing the text to fit his doctrine. The new covenant. Hebrews 10:1 For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect...

The Greek word translated as "short" in that verse is not a word used to refer to a literally small number. The same word is translated as "many" in Matthew 22:14 where Jesus said that "many are called, but few are chosen". It's a word that can be used in a relative sense. Satan's time is...

LOL. Leave it to you to agree with a vast majority of my post only to focus just on the last thing I said. Nice job, buddy. Stop being so deceptive. Do you have no conscience about being dishonest? My point was not in relation to who died in Adam, but rather was in relation to which people Paul...

So, you think Satan is still up in heaven accusing believers? What can he accuse us of when our sins are given and have been covered by the blood of Christ and are not held against us? Romans 8:31 What, then, shall we say in response to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? 32...

Great to see such unity amongst Premils.

Your insults reveal how childish you are and how unable you are to have an adult discussion. You are misinterpreting Zechariah 14, as you've been shown already many times. I do NOT deny that Jesus will descend from heaven. This is just the latest in your long list of lies that you have told...

Not really. You missed the point. Let's look at the verse he was referencing. Revelation 20:6 Blessed and holy are those who share in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years. The...

I'm, of course, referring to Romans 11:26. Some people don't realize that the context of Romans 11 is established back in Romans 9. There is an overarching narrative that Paul taught starting at the beginning of Romans 9 through the end of Romans 11. In Romans 9, Paul establishes the fact that...

No, that Bible translation was quite accurate. The new testament and new covenant are the same. You are sadly mistaken. Scripture says the new covenant was established by Christ long ago which took away the old covenant and made it obsolete and you are ignoring that. Hebrews 8:6 But now hath he...

LOL. Your have such a carnal mind, babe in Christ. 1 Corinthians 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. 2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.

Oh yes, how could we possibly think that Christ's resurrection would be the means by which He would receiver power and authority? How silly of us. I guess you must think Paul is an idiot for writing this... Ephesians 1:19 and his incomparably great power for us who believe. That power is the...

It just amazes me that people think a verse about Christ confirming the new covenant is about some imaginary Anti-Christ confirming some imaginary peace treaty instead. Terrible.

We all do. If I did what David did here, I would expect people to call me out for it. There's no excuse for that, and I include myself in that.

I'm going by what scripture indicates and you're going by your own experience instead. Scripture indicates that he uses the rod of iron to break/destroy His enemies which is compared to a potter's vessel being broken into pieces (Psalm 2:9). Should we just ignore that description of what Jesus...

I just meant that in the sense of being a hypocrite, which you agreed that he is. Or, at least, in terms of what was being talked about here. Not that he always is. He was being prideful by coming on here and ranting at Scott for not knowing better and then proceeding to do nothing to address...

Welcome to the forum. How would you describe your beliefs? Are you pre-trib, mid-trib or post-trib? Are you an amillennialist, premillennialist or postmillennialist? Are you idealist, historicist, preterist, futurist or some combination of those? I know I'm throwing a bunch of labels around...

He's a fake and there's several others like that on here as well. He won't even address any questions we ask him or any of the points that we make. He just says we're wrong and that's it and does nothing to back it up.

You're right. He is a hypocrite. He acts like everyone else is being rude when he is the one that rudely came into this thread out of nowhere and started ranting at Scott that he should know better while not addressing even one of the points that Scott made.

LOL. You act like you just came here to be a peacemaker when you are the one who came here and ranted at Scott telling him he should know better than what he was saying. No, you should know better because you are the one promoting false doctrine, not him. Stop being a hypocrite.

Where? What you quoted here says nothing about Peter submitting to Paul's understanding as if Paul's understanding was superior to his. Notice that Peter said in relation to Paul's writings "untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction". Clearly, Peter understood Paul's writings...