Search results

No. You did not answer any of my 3 questions at all, let alone to my liking. HINT: A non-responsive reply is not an answer. Getting back to my 1st question; does it make sense that God has a God? Your non-responsive reply was to invoke dualism. Asserting part of Jesus is not God. (Again...

You could not even answer my 3 questions.

Yet, you fail to actually cite one verse that states what you claim. That’s your thoughtful reply? A sarcastic repose? Sad diversion from the inadequacy of your argument.

IDOLATRY.

Not one verse says this. Not one.

It’s easier if you ignore the ubiquitous and plain words of Scripture and impose a mystical meaning to vague verses. The more ambiguous, the more mystical meaning and significance can be read into it.

Welcome. Can you tell us a bit about yourself and your spiritual journey?

Facts don’t matter when you have dogma.

It’s dualism, which allows one to shake off the shackles of logic. True that Jesus being the Christ (of God) is the central message of the NT does not divert their attention from the mutually exclusive claim that he ALSO IS.

Agreed. Long OP's serve more as a form of therapy for the writer. I find it far more effective to begin a thread with a short thesis, followed by at least one question you want people in the forum to respond to. I did this just a moment ago in a thread entitled "The Big 3." Also, one reason I...

Jesus repeatedly says he has a God. I believe Jesus over you. However, questions are not a nonsequitor. The implied answer to this 1st question is no, it does not make sense that God has a God. Now, please answer the other 2 questions.

My church discusses 'the Big 3' in a cavalier manner. Perhaps it is so obvious to everyone but me? So, I wanted to discuss it. In the automotive industry after World War II, the American car companies (GM, Ford & Chrysler) had no competition in all the world for the other industrial cities were...

Claiming victory does not actually answer my 3 specific questions. Let's try having an actual conversation and reason together. Shall we?

We can. One reason I did not comment on the OP creed so far is formatting; I'm not sure where the creed ends and your commentary begins. Perhaps the break is as follows. So, I suggest a format like this. Creed Title Creed P1 Creed P2 Creed P3 ... Narrative/Comment Paragraph 1...

Yea, just a little fun invoking of arguments that contradict the facts. Indeed, your post was the opposite, citing MANY verses that tell the story they do not want to hear.

You’re taking one verse in isolation and ignoring the rest of the Bible to support your false doctrine … is a response I got recently from a similar, comprehensive post. LOL.

It’s an invention that a plural word means 3 and only 3. It has no application outside a theologically driven motive. Molecules Cars Cats Dogs None of them refer only 3. Then there are words that are plural in syntax but could be singular in context. ‘I caught a fish’ refers to one. ‘The fish...

It’s not so much finding success as avoiding pitfalls. Risk management. As my spiritual life deepens, I realize the war that rages in laying traps for our destruction. Listen to that inner voice, the quiet voice, the Holy Spirit who prompts you a somewhat innocuous path is anything but - even...

Isn’t it true that all the angels also always have been divine?

LOL. Invention. I suppose the weaker your argument, the stronger you claim it to be. IF what you say were true, you would not have to rely on gnostic private interpretation that only you read into what is there. Hope this helps.