Search results

You are 100% incorrect here. You don't think the following is referring to the resurrection of the dead in Christ? It most certainly is. 1 Corinthians 15:51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, 52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last...

How does that point to a pre-trib rapture? I said they are the souls of the dead in Christ. Where they are located in heaven is irrelevant. You're not doing anything here to show that the great multitude has been raptured rather it being a reference to the souls of the dead in Christ.

Can you please address what I said first before I address your question? How many times do I need to tell you that I'm not interested in having a discussion where I address your points and questions but you don't address mine? Why did Jesus say that ALL who are in the graves will be resurrected...

Amen, brother! Excellent post.

You are being completely contradictory here. The old covenant could not continue and be invalid at the same time. That makes no sense whatsoever. If you truly believe that it was invalid after the cross, then you can't contradict that and say that it continued after that. Some people foolishly...

At the same time, according to Matthew 13:36-43, Matthew 13:47-50 and Matthew 25:31-46. Agree? What do you mean by this exactly?

Agree. It's somewhat shocking that you even say this since most futurists would disagree with you. Anyway, Jesus specifically said it will include "ALL that are in the graves". So, why do you not have it including "ALL that are in the graves"? You don't think Jesus knew what He was talking...

Yes, they will. Can you tell me how you interpret the following passage? John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done...

It says one day is as a thousand years, not one day equals a thousand years. That means one day is just as a thousand years to the Lord, meaning there is no difference between a day and a thousand years to the Lord since He is not confined within the realm of time. Anyway, no, that verse has...

Why are you dodging my question? You are claiming that the dead in verse 12 are different than the dead in verse 13, so tell me what evidence you have that the dead in verse 12 come from somewhere besides the sea, death or hell (Hades). Where else can the dead come from? Nowhere. You're not...

I don't sound silly to those who know the truth. The truth is foolishness to those like you who don't rely on the Holy Spirit for understanding, but instead interpret scripture like the natural man (1 Cor 2:9-16). I agree up until number 3, but this is where you start interjecting your own...

The Bible wasn't written in English. But, believe what you want. If the dead in verse 12 are not from the sea, death or hell (Hades), then where are they from?

There's something that, for some unknown reason, that you haven't considered here. Jesus would NEVER tell anyone to worship anyone but Himself or God the Father. What in the world are you even thinking by believing something like that? Yet, that's what you are saying about Revelation 3:9. Why in...

It doesn't start with the word "And" in some translations, but I don't see how that proves anything, anyway.

The why do you say the old covenant age ended in 70 AD instead of at the cross?

So, was it dead at the time that verse was written or not? You can't seem to make up your mind. You're not differentiating between what it means for it to be dead (obsolete) and what it means for it to vanish away. So, tell me the difference between it being dead and it vanishing away? Because...

No, verse 13 explains where the dead in verse 12 came from. I believe you're making this more complicated than it is. Being judged according to their works requires being based on the works described in the books. So, I disagree. That verse is referring to the law of Moses and Revelation...

Some partial preterists claim that the old covenant was still valid until 70 AD. You say that you don't think that the old covenant was still valid after the cross, but then you contradict that by saying that the old covenant age ended in 70 AD. No, it ended at the cross.

No, of course I wouldn't, but that is not a valid comparison because when the Jews were making offerings in the temple they were making them to the one true God. They weren't aware that it wasn't required, but at least their intention was to obey the one true God. In contrast to that, you would...

That's a lie. I don't ignore any of them, I interpret them differently than you do. That's an absolute lie. I'm not going to waste any more time on you since you have no conscience about lying about me.