Search results

There is no however. The experiment failed to show the basic flaw of evolution; bacteria do not "evolve" into different kinds of animals, like sting rays, birds or squirrels. Sure, we agree that like animals will adapt to their environment and produce like offspring. Yet, they remain the same...

Convenient, which makes it not a scientific hypothesis since it is not testable in any practical sense. Yet, nearly universally believed with no evidence by those who demand absolute proof of God. Consider this vid

Bashing national pride is just another way that shows you are a Cultural Marxist.

LOL. From Darwins book. Have you ever read The Origin of Species? I have. Isn’t evolution supposed to explain The Origin of Species?

So says the fascist.

My dear sir. Cultural Marxism has it backwards. It’s not that minorities were ever competent but rather always the minority, by definition, out of power. Cultural Marxism falsely asserts they are out of power for oppressor v oppressed dichotomies.

No. Truth is absolute. There are not degrees of truth or false. If I tell a big long story and 90% of it is true, it means the remaining 10% is 100% false. So, the key is to divide things discreetly into such absolutes.

Fact.

As I said, there is not one single instance of one kind of animal to another. Funny how absolutely no evidence what so ever caused you to conclude ‘real, beyond any reasonable doubt’ for what you believe. Yet, with mountains of evidence to support we believe, it’s totally unconvincing to...

Here, you pivot again from only what one can experience is real to things can be real if if you can’t experience it. The authority for this pivot is not theologians but quantum mechanics, which you no doubt capitalized to suggest greater authority than it really does. Many Patriarchs -...

That’s Differentia! Also, you pivoted from experience to thoughts.

No, I really do understand evolution and like many scientists, I pontificated it for decades - until I educated myself by entertaining fact-based criticism. See Is Genesis Real?

Again no. Here again , you seem to be equating existence to experience.

No. My response is not emotional but intellectual. There simply is a difference between experiencing X with merely having thoughts about X. Your philosophy deems them both experiences with no apparent Differentia. Therefore, in application, you cannot identify a person who is an ACTUAL eye...

I was raised with this sort of thinking. I gravitated toward soul sleep more as I read the Bible. The basic theological problem with immediately going to heaven is that it circumvents Judgement Day.

The billions of witnesses.

Evolution were true there would exist at least a single example of an animal evolving into another kind, like a horse to a bird, dog to a fish, bat to a worm. The complete lack of evidence does not bother Atheists when it comes to their core beliefs.

Funny that you deny that which you promote in every post AS IF there is no other world view that the Cultural Marxism that you are steeped in.

It's not the word; it's the unbound - and therefore, invalid - concept that I'm "stuck" on. Your use of "experience" lacks Differentia with a closest synonym being existence. I say this because the only alternative frame to it is non-existence. If you have not experienced X, then it is like a...

Likewise, it is really quite remarkable the number of specific and repeatable things you consider to NOT be proof of god.