Search results

Scripture never teaches that everyone has to be given the chance to hear the gospel and believe. Those who didn't hear the gospel will be judged based on the criteria that Paul talks about in Romans 1 and 2 which means they will be judged based on what they did know. As Paul explained, no one...

What do you think, that the judgment that occurs at the last day will be completed in 24 hours? Billions of people judged within 24 hours? Really? Are you even thinking? You guys believe things that are not even within reason.

You Premils never understand what Amils believe, so you constantly misrepresent what we believe. Why not make more of an effort to understand what we believe so that you stop looking so ignorant? What we believe is that not the judgment occurs on the last day as if it occurs within the realm...

Almost everything you say is worthy of a LOL. Once the last day arrives, then the judgment will occur after that. What is hard to understand about that? Does this look like the judgment occurs within the realm of time when it indicates it will not take place either on earth or in heaven...

No matter how much you childishly use caps, it doesn't make what you say true. So, you apparently didn't even read the verses I used to support my claim. They explicitly state that Jesus was crucified outside of Jerusalem, so you are the one telling a lie. John 19:20 This title then read many...

You didn't address anything I said in my post. It's hopeless to try to have a discussion with you. You won't address anything anyone else says. You're talking to yourself.

I don't know what your point is in this thread, but scripture teaches that His future parousia is associated directly with His second coming. Some try to make His parousia and His second coming two completely separate events, but that is not the case. Matthew 24:27 For as the lightning cometh...

That's referring to historical kingdoms beginning with ancient Babylon, not to future kingdoms that all exist at the same time. Verse 12 is in parentheses because it's just a parenthetical addition to explain what had happened to the previous historical kingdoms after the fourth beast, the Roman...

Where are you seeing that in the passages I quoted? Do you not want to actually address them and you'd rather just ignore them or what? My issue has not been addressed at all. The text does not say anything that you're saying here. Those passages describe global destruction, not just...

Right. John 8:19 Then said they unto him, Where is thy Father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know me, nor my Father: if ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also. Agree. John 5:45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye...

Yes, that very well may be the case. I agree. So, that's well worth pointing out. Agree. Definitely would not be God ordained and therefore could not be considered "the temple of God".

How about you actually address the scriptures I brought up before posting other scriptures that you expect me to address before you even address the scriptures I referenced? Is that too much to ask? How does your view line up with what is taught here: 1 Thessalonians 5:2 For yourselves know...

Yep. His denial of being a futurist is quite funny. <laugh>

Yep. But, even if such a temple was ever built, it can't be considered God's temple since it would not be built by God's direction like the two previous temples were. So, how can anyone think that such a temple built in the future could be considered "the temple of God"? It couldn't be since it...

I have no interest in discussing this with you any further. I don't see your multiple prophecy theory as being valid at all. It's one prophecy. So, let's just agree to disagree.

How can anything take place 1000 years after He comes when the earth will experience "sudden destruction" by fire when He comes from which those in spiritual darkness "shall not escape"? 1 Thessalonians 5:2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the...

It's not 3 different prophecies. There is no basis for that claim whatsoever. It's one 70 week prophecy of which the 7 weeks, 62 weeks and 1 week, which add up to 70 weeks, are part. It's 70 continuous weeks where certain things happen during the first 7 weeks (rebuilding of Jerusalem) and then...

Revelation 19:14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. I see that you take the reference to white horses literally. Do you take the reference to white and clean fine linen literally, too? You shouldn't since earlier in the...

You're not understanding my point here. If the 7 weeks run parallel to some of the 62 weeks then that is not going to add up to 69 weeks. Let me simplify this a bit to show what I'm talking about. Let's say there were 10 weeks in the prophecy instead of 70 and they were divided up into 3, 6 and...

So, how do you end up with 70 weeks then? Please explain that. For me, it's easy. You take 7 + 62 + 1. That's 70. I have no idea how you get to 70 weeks in your view if the 7 weeks runs parallel to some of the 62 weeks. Did you not say at one point that it's not about the first advent at all...