Search results

No, Jesus was not crucified in Jerusalem. Which you will accept if you truly accept what scripture teaches. I have a feeling that you will not accept what these scriptures teach, though, because you typically believe what you want to believe regardless of what scripture teaches. John 19:20...

Have you never read this passage: Acts 2:29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. 30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of...

Agree. Satan would like nothing more than for Christians to believe in annihilationism because it hinders evangelism. What do those Christians say to unbelievers who also believe in annihilationism? They think this life is all there is. So, what can Christians who believe in annihilation tell...

A post-trib premill can be a futurist. You are very ignorant. You are conflating pre-trib dispensationalism with futurism. Pre-trib is just one variation of futurism, so there is not just one variation of futurism. Similar to how there are multiple variations of preterism (full and partial)...

It does not say "that the devil will be turned to ashes by being cast into the future "lake of fire". Your belief in annihilation is false. Read what the text actually says. Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the...

No, He hasn't. I'm talking about Jesus in His humanity here just to be clear. I know He is God and has always existed, also, but He didn't begin to reign as both God and man until after His resurrection. Did He say this since during creation week? Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto...

I thought you claim to be someone who interprets scripture "as written"? Do you accept the scriptures which say that Jesus was not crucified in Jerusalem as written? Hebrews 13:12 Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate. John 19:20...

Ha ha. These Futurists like Davy try to claim that they are not Futurists. Ha ha. You don't have to believe in the false pre-trib rapture theory to be a futurist. You are confusing being a futurist with being a dispensationalist. You are a different kind of futurist than them.

I'm not saying Jerusalem's influence was "very minimal", but not the complete global influence that Babylon has. The mistake here is in your understanding of my point. The truths taught in the book of Revelation apply to all generations, not just John's own generation. Thinking otherwise if...

Here is your terrible reading comprehension skills on display yet again! That is not what I said! Read what I said again only more carefully this time. I said that if two passages don't have the same details then that does not necessarily mean they are not about the same event. So, I said the...

LOL. You are a comedian. Nonsense. They is more than one variation of futurism. You are thinking I'm calling you a dispensationalist, but I'm not. But, you ARE a futurist. Saying otherwise just makes you look ridiculous since you clearly are one. Yes, that idea is idiotic which is why only...

Where does Acts 1 say such a thing? You're all talk. It says no such thing. It says He will descend from heaven in like manner as He ascended to heaven, which was visibly and bodily. Nowhere in Acts 1 does it say that He would return to th eplace from where He left. You are badly twisting...

Good ol' Davy. Once again condemning people just because they disagree with his end times doctrine. Just remember that you will be judged using the same measure that you are judging me. Matthew 7:1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with...

More empty words from Davy that he can't back up. You noticeably didn't even try to back up your words. Because you know you can't. You just believe what you want to believe and can't defend your beliefs convincingly with scripture.

Davy, you waste so much time making straw man arguments. I never said that Peter taught that the earth will be annihilated. Peter did make it clear that fire will come down upon the entire earth and he said despite that, according to the promise of Christ's second coming, we still look forward...

Don't you already know that God is just? Where is this concept that you're talking about taught in scripture? Total nonsense. This is not taught anywhere in scripture. Are you a Seventh-Day Adventist?

Both preterists and futurists are wrong about Babylon, but so are historicists. The idealist view gets forgotten and overlooked, but it is the correct one. Babylon does not represent any particular earthly entity, but rather represents the spiritual opposite of the heavenly new Jerusalem. It is...

You're not digging deep enough for the truth here. Jesus said that those who believe in Him will be resurrected on the last day (John 6:40), so why do you have unbelievers being resurrected 1,000+ years after the last day? In your doctrine the last day is not actually the last day, but in Amil...

This is utter nonsense. The rest of the dead are dead in the same way that those that were referenced who have part in the first resurrection are dead, which is physically. They, along with those who have part in the first resurrection, are not bodily resurrected until after the thousand years...

LOL. Are you somehow not aware that he is an amillennialist? You do know that, right? Therefore, you should have known what he meant and that he wouldn't say something that would contradict his own beliefs. You agree with Amils and disagree with all other Premils that all of the dead will be...