Search results

I don't buy the dual meaning explanation at all. That seems like a cop out to me. It seems that when people are shown that something was not fulfilled in the past, they resort to the dual meaning or dual fulfillment explanation. Where is there any indication in the text itself that Babylon...

Do you understand that by making this comment you are saying that the 70 week prophecy is not yet fulfilled? How can you recognize that the events in verse 24 could only be fulfilled by Jesus, but then say they are still happening? You are looking at this like those who believe the 70th week is...

Thanks for your kind words, I appreciate it. Here it is: Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up...

What basis is there for having the 7 weeks run parallel to some of the 62 weeks? There is no indication of that in the text whatsoever. Instead it has them separated with the 7 weeks coming first followed by the 62 weeks. How does your view have 70 weeks total if you don't have the 7 and 62...

The problem here is that you apparently have the 7 weeks occurring after the 62 weeks, but that is not the case. The 7 weeks comes first, followed by the 62 weeks. Daniel 7:25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the...

Apparently not. He seems to think he is in a forum where scripture doesn't matter and what he comes up with in his own imagination is all that matters.

Do you not understand that the 7 weeks came before the 62 weeks? That is what is indicated in Daniel 7:25. Which means what it is actually saying in verse 26 is that the anointed one would be cut off after the 69th week (7 + 62). And that was Jesus. He was cut off during the 70th week when he...

Jesus was not crucified in Jerusalem. John 19:20 Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Aramaic, Latin and Greek. Hebrews 13:12 12 And so Jesus also suffered outside the city gate to make the people holy through...

Everyone here can see how childish you are and how unwilling you are to respond to challenges to your view. You think you responded to my points about Jesus coming as a thief and the rapture not occurring yet as of the time of the sixth vial (Rev 16:12-17), but you just swept that under the rug...

Well, the ones who were unbelievers had a choice to believe or not in the first place, but at that point in time almost 2,000 years ago, it was God who blinded them and it was clearly purposeful and deliberate. Romans 11:7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the...

I'm already proven right by the fact that no individual Antichrist is referenced in those passages. John makes it clear that anyone (not just one person) who denies Christ is an antichrist and there were already many antichrists in the world at that time and the spirit of antichrist was already...

Let me know if you ever grow up and want to have a discussion where you actually back up your claims with scripture. Until then, it's impossible to take you seriously.

No need to back up your claims? You know others read these posts as well, right? Do it for their benefit if nothing else. You're not willing to discuss any of the scriptures I posted that disprove pre-trib. Meanwhile, all you do is make claims without posting any scripture to back them up. Why...

There is no individual Antichrist referenced in those passages. What was heard before that time was that the spirit of antichrist was coming and John said it was already in the world at that time as evidenced by the many antichrists that were already in the world at that time.

Amils believe that His kingdom is both in heaven and on the earth, but is spiritual and heavenly in nature rather than physical and earthly as premils believe.

Despite my showing you the context of what being blinded in part means by quoting Romans 11:5-7, where Paul talks about a remnant of Israelites in his day being saved and the rest being blinded (therefore, the rest who were blinded represented the part of Israel that was blinded - blinded in...

Total nonsense. This is ridiculous. The Bible never contradicts itself. You are basically saying the Bible is not trustworthy by saying this. Unbelievable.

That's not what Paul taught. 2 Thessalonians 2:1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him, 2 That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of...

The blindness in part doesn't refer to individuals being blind in part, whatever that would even mean. It refers to part of Israel being spiritually blind and part not being spiritually blind. Paul explained that here: Romans 11:5 Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant...

If you belong to Christ then you have the Holy Spirit dwelling in you and helping you stay in the spiritual light by being able to discern what is true and what is false which then helps to keep you from being deceivd and falling into spiritual darkness. The key is to stay in tune with the Holy...