Search results

This is utterly ridiculous and shameful for you to undermine Paul and Peter like this. There is no basis for what you're saying whatsoever. Instead of making the effort to reconcile what John wrote with what Paul and Peter wrote you have decided that Paul and Peter can't be trusted to have...

Your version of Premill is very strange because you might be the only Premill in the world who agrees with Amill's interpretation of John 5:28-29. So, do you not believe that anyone dies during the supposed future thousand years or during Satan's little season since you don't believe anyone is...

This is the usual biased nonsense from you. In John 5:28-29 Jesus does not give any indication that He's talking about an hour as a long period of time at the beginning of which believers are resurrected and at the end of which unbelievers are resurrected. No one in their right mind would take a...

Well, I would encourage you to do so. There's a lot of info you can find about each view by just doing a search online. But, just know that not all Amils believe everything the same and not all Premils believe everything the same. But, all Amils would agree that the thousand years is figurative...

What is clear to you isn't necessarily going to be clear to someone else. You should know that and I shouldn't have to explain that concept to you. You are being very prideful here in thinking that you are so clear that everyone should be able to understand what you're saying. Humble yourself...

That is not at all what 2 Peter 3:8 is saying. You are acting as if the verse is written like this: But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord equal to a thousand years, and a thousand years equal to one day. But, that is not how it is written. Instead, it...

Who is spiritualizing everything? This is the classic false accusation that Premils make towards Amils. It's a joke. You are the one who spiritualizes passages like Matthew 24:15-21 and 2 Peter 3:10-12, but you try to say that Amils spiritualize everything? Ridiculous. What are you even talking...

You are so hypocritical. You are describing yourself. YOU have a fixed agenda with your nonsensical 7000 year theory with no intention of changing despite having your errors exposed. That's good news. Look in the mirror. You are again talking about yourself.

Yes, he does. That is not at all what verses like Psalm 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8 mean, though. What those verses mean is that the Lord is not affected by time. He is eternal. So, no amount of time, including one day or a thousand years, makes any difference to Him. Because of that, no one can say...

Good grief, David. Have you not acknowledged multiple times in the past that you are not as good at communicating clearly in a setting like this as you are talking to someone in person? Why do you have to be so offended when someone tells you that you're not being clear? I could not follow what...

Wrong. I interpret them differently than you do. That is not a case of ignoring and dismissing them. Do you have nothing else to offer but these lies that you tell about me? LOL! There is absolutely no reference to a 2000 year church age or future 1000 year reign of Jesus in those passages. You...

You're wrong. I get that there are passages that you are not able to reconcile with Amil. But, there are also passages that you are not able to reconcile with Premil, which you have admitted. So, why do you take a strong stance either way when it comes to Amil and Premil, knowing that there are...

Yep. Agree completely. He knows he can't deny that the new heavens and new earth are ushered in when Jesus comes since scripture teaches that so clearly. But, he wants to cling to Premil so badly that instead of acknowledging the truth of Amil that most people do when they recognize that the new...

That's the problem. You interpret Revelation 21 and 22 with doctrinal bias instead of taking an objective approach to it and seeing what you discover. I don't understand that kind of thinking. Clearly, Revelation 21 and 22 describe a time when there is no more death, sorrow, crying or pain (Rev...

That is referring to when Jesus delivers His kingdom to the Father when He comes again (1 Corinthians 15:22-24). That's why it refers to "the kingdom of our Lord and of his Messiah". The kingdom of the Father and His Son, in other words. But, right now, we are in Christ's kingdom. The Father has...

Is that what I said? No. What is wrong with you? Why do you not ask this of everyone who shares their interpretations? You are offended that I have a strong opinion on something? So do many others here, but I don't see you asking them a question like this. Should I ask you this question every...

I wonder why you are a Premil, too. It's not as if it's only other Premils who are inconsistent in their view and you are not. You are, too. I also have to wonder why you would apply Revelation 21 and 22 to the thousand years when they clearly refer to eternity instead when "there shall be no...

That is exactly what tailgator believes, which is completely foolish.

No one is doing that. We're simply calling you out for butchering those verses and making them say what you want them to say. You have no clear scripture to support your doctrine so you have to resort to twisting scriptures like those to keep your false doctrine afloat. Yet, you have proven to...

This is complete nonsense. Are you saying that Jesus Himself did not prophesy about the end times in the Olivet Discourse? Are you saying that Paul and Peter didn't prophesy about the end times? No wonder you don't take their teachings into account. You think they didn't know what they were...