Search results

Absolutely not. He is a premillennialist so he thinks that Satan is cast into the lake of fire 1,000+ years after the beast and false prophet are. I am an amillennialist and believe that Satan will be cast into the lake of fire shortly after the beast and false prophet are. Then death and hell...

Based on what is written in Revelation 14:9-11 and Revelation 20:10, I would say that it results in being tormented, yes. The word death is not a synonym for annihilation. It means to be separate. When we physically die, our body dies and is separated from our soul and spirit. The second death...

Yes. All of the unsaved experience a first death, which is physical death. But, they also will experience the second death when they are cast into the lake of fire. This depends on whether being cast into the lake of fire itself results in experiencing the second death or if the second death...

Stop your lies. You have no conscience. You just make up lies that you can't back up. Have you no shame? As I already told you before, Justin Martyr, an early church father who lived from 100 AD to 165 AD, said that there were many true Christians who did not agree with his belief in...

Says the guy who is too afraid to address any of the many arguments Amils have made that refute your false claims. Amils don't claim that the second death is for anyone but the unsaved, so what is your point here? That is what scripture clearly teaches. All the living wicked are physically...

I'm an amillennialist, so my understanding is that the devil is cast into the lake of fire shortly after the beast and false prophet are cast into the lake of fire. Similar to how death and hell (Hades) are cast into the lake of fire and then after that those whose names are not written in the...

What do you mean by this? The second death is not something that occurs "during His 1,000 years reign with His elect". The second death occurs AFTER the thousand years (and Satan's little season) at the judgment when the unsaved are cast into the lake of fire which is the second death...

Exactly. That is what I was referring to. But, Premils think that God, after Christ returns, will inexplicably require people to go to Jerusalem again to worship Him instead of requiring people to worship Him in spirit and in truth, as has been the case the past almost 2,000 years since Jesus...

So, in other words, it's your belief that you are the only one in the world who believes correctly on some things. Do you know how that comes across? Why didn't you answer my question? I'm asking you where you believe we will dwell for eternity after Christ's glorious second coming? Do you not...

I didn't say that you did. I was talking to Keraz there, not you. Look again at that post (#139) and you can see that. I know you do. Again, I was talking to Keraz, not you.

Notice that Premil has no clear scripture they can point to that supports their view. Verses like Hosea 6:2 and Luke 13:32 certainly do not clearly and straightforwardly support Premil. Not even close. They think Revelation 20, contained within the most highly symbolic book in the entire Bible...

Why do you mess with the plain statements of Jesus in passages like John 5:28-29, Matthew 13:36-43, Matthew 13:47-50, Matthew 24:35-39 and Matthew 25:31-46? Why do you mess with the plain statements of Paul in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:3, 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10 and 1 Corinthians 15:22-28? Why do...

LOL. You have refuted nothing. Your entire theory is based on twisting scripture like Hosea 6:2 to say what you want it to say. You have no clear scripture to support your doctrine. So, your left to butcher verses like Hosea 6:2 to make it support your false doctrine. Also, you are completely...

LOL! You know someone has no idea how to debate when they resort to ludicrous comments like this. Everyone here believes that Revelation 20:4-6 means what it says, but we obviously don't all agree on what it is saying. The order of resurrections that Paul gives is very simple. Christ's...

Keraz has proven that he is completely incapable of refuting Amil and supporting the premil view that he has all to himself. He makes a lot of bold claims, but fails to back them up with coherent arguments from scripture over and over again.

Only the simple minded make comments like that. Tell me, who exactly do you believe will be populating the earth during the supposed future thousand years? Talk about a fat joke. You're just babbling here. Earthly Jerusalem is not "the beloved city". That is referring to the heavenly Jerusalem...

That's what we all think, but if we have any beliefs all to ourselves, that should raise a red flag. Do you believe that God reveals some truth only to you? When did I say otherwise? I didn't. Are you sure you're reading what I'm saying? I said absolutely nothing that would suggest that I...

I am correct that your doctrine contradicts what Paul taught. He did not teach that there would be multiple mass resurrections of believers in the future as you believe. Also, Jesus is King of kings and Lord of lords right now. Matthew 28:18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in...

Not to some, like you, since you don't understand what it means. Total nonsense. You are contradicting what Paul taught in 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 which is that ALL of the dead in Christ will be resurrected at the same time, which will be when Jesus returns. Why do you not think Paul can be...

They will never have to do that. Why would they have to do that? Was Jesus lying when He taught that God requires people to no longer go to Jerusalem to worship Him, but instead requires them to worship Him in spirit and in truth? John 4:19 The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou...