Search results

That's not addressing anything in the OP. I don't even know what you're talking about. Do you not know how to communicate? You clearly didn't even read the OP because he never says that resurrected saints don't die. How can they be resurrected if they don't die if we're talking about the bodily...

LOL. How are you addressing something in the original post by referencing something it doesn't say? How about addressing what it does say? Quote something from it that he said and address it. Is that too much to ask? You expect us to address your points before you even address one of his? Is...

Notice that no one even attempts to address any of the points you made in your OP. It's not hard to see why.

Revelation 20:6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years. Would you agree that having part in the first resurrection is a requirement in...

Are you afraid to address anything from the orginal posts in the thread? After all, that's what this thread is about. Looks like you know you can't refute anything said in those posts since you aren't even attempting to do so. You're trying to get me to speak from your fautly perspective, but...

Another lie from you. Don't blame me for your inability to understand what others believe. Everyone here except you knows that I know the difference between being born again spiritually, which is a current reality, and being bodily resurrected at the last day which happens in the future. You...

Now you know what it's like to be me talking to you and dealing with your constant straw man arguments. You reap what you sow.

Notice I didn't respond to him without seeing how you responded to him first because I wasn't sure if what he said was a correct presentation of what you believe. So, you agree with amils that we are in Christ's kingdom now and we are priests in His kingdom now? That's what the following passage...

It's not just Acts 26:23 that I base my belief on, but also scriptures like Colossians 2:12-13, Ephesians 2:4-6 and Romans 6:9-11 that talk about how we spiritually have part in Christ's resurrection, which is the first resurrection. Jesus taught that all of the dead will be resurrected at the...

Useless comments with nothing to back them up. Is it not pride that you think everything you believe is correct and that you can't possibly be wrong about anything, which is obviously the case for you? Look in the mirror.

Why do you only quote a small part of my post where people can't even see what I was saying? That is deceptive on your part and shows your unwillingness to honestly address my point. You said that the term "the first resurrection" is not found anywhere else in scripture and I proved you wrong...

Don't tell me what I must see. Don't act like you are in tune with the Lord and I am not. I will never see that Rev 20:4-6 is not now because it's not true. Are believers not priests of God and of Christ right now? Revelation 1:5-6 says we are. Is Jesus not reigning now? Matthew 28:16-18 and...

Nonsense. Why is it that premils misrepresent amils all the time? It's either a case of complete ignorance or a case of purposely doing it because of not having any other way to try to refute amil. Maybe a mix of both. But, it's just ridiculous that we need to put up with this nonsense of being...

Why do you continually make this argument as if amils would ever give it any credibility? YOU are the one that thinks being in the pit makes whatever is in it incapacitated, not us. You're not going to convince amils of what you're saying when we don't agree that being in the pit makes whatever...

2 Peter 3:8 has nothing to do with the last day. It has to do with the fact that the Lord exists outside of time and time does not affect Him and no amount of time makes any difference to Him including a day or a thousand years. That's it. That's why it can't be said that He is being slow to...

I saw post 441. What is your point as it relates to my post 442?

I would have given your post a like except for that last statement, which you know I disagree with. But, I agree with the rest of what you said. It's too bad that other premils are not able to even acknowledge that truth that you recognize which is that having part in the first resurrection is...

This is not true when it comes to the original Greek manuscript. Do you ever consult any Greek resources when studying the New Testament? The Greek words translated as "first resurrection" are "protos" (first) and "anastasis" (resurrection). Those words are used together in the following verse...

I consider those who have had part in the first resurrection to be those who have spiritually had part in Jesus Christ's bodily resurrection, which is the first resurrection from the dead (1 Cor 15:20, Acts 26:23), by way of being born again. Is there anything hard to understand about that...

Is it your view that having part in the first resurrection means to have part in Christ's resurrection? If so, we agree on that. Scripture clearly teaches that His resurrection was the first resurrection from the dead, right? Acts 26:23 That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the...