Search results

Yet, you make post after post, proving your interest. Capitalism & National Debt have nothing to do with the topic at hand. (Sounds like a good topic for another thread).

When reading with the wrong eyes? The verse of the sword is unqualified. There is no comparable unqualified verse in the NT. Waging war was in the OT - directed at peoples who no longer exist. The Koran is remarkably void of context. Like Psalms or Proverbs, one chapter really has nothing to...

There is no verse of the sword in Christianity. As a civlized nation, we must be more capable of violence than barbarians. However, you are comparing nation States to ideology AS IF it were equivalent. Not too many kill IN THE NAME OF JESUS. And this brings us to Godless States. Communism has...

Not to hijack the thread ... One of the most common errors with this is to confuse Muslims, who are people, with Islam, the evil ideology they have been indoctrinated into. A Muslim who is good is not a good Muslim. The more a person practices Christianity, the more peaceful they will be. The...

We all deserve hell. Why should atheists be any different? One of the most foolish things I've ever heard anyone say is that they are not at war with Islam. It doesn't change the fact that Islam is at war with you. Just because you do not believe in a certain part of reality, does not make it...

Perhaps but God sees. God made this world and although it is a fallen world, it is still beautiful and good in many ways. Sure, atheists can be good as far as the world is concerned. However, Jesus said only God is good. In addition, your concept of justice does not fully square with God's plan...

I recently came across this translation from Names of God Bible (NOG) - Version Information - BibleGateway.com VERSIONS / NAMES OF GOD BIBLE (NOG) Publisher: Baker Books Version Information The Names of God Bible (NOG) accurately translates the meaning of the original texts into clear...

Except he also called him his God. John 20:17, Rev 3:2 and in verse 12, Jesus referred to his God 4 times! To refer to your God 4 times in one verse is really saying something. It’s interesting that Jesus repeatedly referred to his God.

Says you. See @RLT63 post. Wonder where he got that or you already have your answer - in denying the verse AFTER he said he exists, where he explicitly identified his name. But our Creator did not end there. He went on to say this is the name he is to be remembered for all generations. It...

Not only are you taking it out of contex, you are adding words to Scripture. Jesus statement is unqualified. You are adding the qualifier, 'while He was on earth.' In addition, 1 COR 11:3 clearly says that God - in his entirety, in his unitarian nature - is the head of Christ. There is no...

Symbol v Metaphor?! Really! A common tactic of mystics, of those who over-spiritualize Scripture, is to parse synonyms. What does Scripture say about this? Avoid such foolish fights over words! 14 Remind everyone about these things, and command them in God’s presence to stop fighting over...

Hmmm. Not quite. 1st, he differentiated himself from other gods in being eternal. 2nd, the nature of the Creator’s existence, eternal, is not merely a label but a defining characteristic. This means, this is how the Creator is different from his creation. 3rd, we are not talking about the...

I asked a positive question; what is God’s name and what verse is it in? Your reply is negative; telling me what his name is NOT. I will say again that some translations do use the letter you deny. Odd to pile denial on top of denial.

For some reason, you keep trying to make this personal. The evidence is in. The KJV is obsolete, both FROM the manuscripts the translation came from; and the TO, no one speaks this way anymore. This is the reason modern translations use the better Alexandrian manuscripts.

Ya, OK. I post links to support my argument, not make it for me. How about we return to the OP? I may be getting confused between current threads on essentially same topic but I made this point recently. It is preposterous to assert that any ancient document that is closer to the source with...

Episkopos has shown himself to be wrong about a great many things, especially this; the criteria of obtaining salvation. Romans 10:9 If you openly declare that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. Episkopos is such a mystic, he sees fit...

Well, deflecting from your hijacking attempt and back to the OP, whose thesis is the original manuscripts of KJV is not worse than older manuscripts of modern translations. To support this, the OP relies on opinion and personal attack of Wescott and Hort. Bad conversation. I can just imagine...

It’s funny because I think the same way about you. Remember, If I say something that could be taken 2 ways, and one way is wrong, I meant the other way.

Another copy and paste! You must do this hoping I make your point for you. LOL.

You do like to get lost in the weeds, in search of a cogent argument, changing the subject time and again. This thread is not about my preferences for the name of Jesus’ God.