Search results

We both realize it is a linguistic attempt to escape their guilt for sinning. The absurdity is extrapolating ‘being born’ to escape the guilt for all sin. Why is this sexual sin excused but not other sin? There is no reason. It’s a pathway of the Adversary. Just another linguistic attempt to...

Where did the 1st homosexual learn it from?

I think we are saying the same. One may be born feeling attracted or tempted to one sin over another. However, it seems you are not recognizing the subtle abuse of language of the enemy. Regardless of how one feels or when such emotions emerged (from birth or later), it is NOT the emotion but...

Logic dictates the one making the positive claim have the burden of proof. The fact that the trinity - the word or doctrine - is not in the Bible is an unrecoverable fact. The trinity ‘could be’ right but not because of anything God said. So, there is that!

Rev 3:14 is devastating to trinitarian dogma. No wonder I haven’t seen any reply. Just ignore what does not support (which is the vast majority of Scripture). A "mike drop moment" Another "mike drop moment" Another "mike drop moment". You are on such a roll!

Saw this and thought of you @Romanov2488. Hope it helps.

@marks, Nothing is more profound than people displaying the limits of their responsibility - by literally not responding. @Matthias asked you. 1. about the saviors Yahweh sent. And I asked you Three questions. We've asked you these 3 questions multiple times. Here is a 4th; why do you...

What you said does not follow from the text since there is no innocence. I've observed the feminization of our society has equated feelings/emotions with actions and facts. They are not equal! "Being" gay is a reprehensible expression that falsely implies an innocent crime since there is no...

We are all born broken in some way, eh?

Contradictions are not a mystery.

But this thread is not about that. This thread is to counter the Strawman that believers go on "blind" faith. My pastor says we Christians have the benefit of lived experience. This gives us such an advantage over atheists, who have merely an argument, and a blind argument at that.

Agency exists. If a captain orders his men to rescue you, a drowning man. Who is your savior; the man who pulls you out of the water or the captain who sent him?

Nothing about Jesus. I good example of God's agency though. How does God save? Through his agent. I just referenced a bunch of them. Funny how trinitarians can read into text to support their doctrine but it escapes them that 1,000's of verses imply Jesus is not God GIVEN the mutual exclusivity...

No Scripture says that. On the other hand Scripture tells us over and over and over again that Jesus is not God but of God - servant, son, lamb, word of God. If Jesus were God, there would be no verses that juxtapose God with Jesus but there are many, e.g., Acts 2:36 God made Jesus both Lord...

Seems you embrace the concept. (And I didn't ask if you reject the term) If Jesus was born 100% God, why did God's spirit descend on him when he was baptized?

Not only is this nowhere in Scripture, it contradicts Judeo-Christian theology on the wages of sin and substitutionary punishment. No part of Jesus can be God for all parts of Jesus had to die. This is why Romans 10:9 makes salvation a condition of believing that God - in his unitarian nature -...

So, you reject the trinity, then?

LOL. It doesn’t answer the question at all. But that’s OK.

What verse says the personal name of the Holy Spirit is Jesus?