Search results

RT, I'm just having fun. There is a guy in Denmark who opens these threads with a cryptic title. The only words in the OP are "Can you say me it." I don' think English is his 1st language. Others seem to know what he means. I think it is funny. LOL Regarding what you have lied about. I think...

Except for when trinitarians are not monotheists.

I’m saying Jesus is not God.

Yes it is.

As you know, An idol is something man-made that is worshipped. This includes the man-is-god thesis.

LOL The fact that you 'do not know' reveals the idolatry of your doctrine. The Apostles were monotheists who did not recognize any God but Jesus' God. It's not that you don't know. It's that you want to ignore the significance of the fact that those who walked with Jesus, and Jesus himself, did...

See my thread on REAL lowercase gods in Scripture.

Taking a step back from Christology, relentless indoctrination rhetoric and modern day perversion of equality, we live in a world of powerful rulers, who are truly lords and gods. The terms "lord" and "god" has been co-opted to only mean THE SUPREME BEING. I demonstrated in the OP that this is...

Does the qualifier, "technically" imply there is a non-technical sense in which this is NOT correct?

Me too. Do you know how to indent? I haven't figured that out. Also, I don't know how to adjust the order of quoted sections. (Normally, I quote sentences in long posts as a I read it. Then reverse the order in my response so it matches the order in which it was written. Now, I cannot do that...

Peculiar False Alternative. Nothing has to stop something that never happened.

In the vid Is Genesis History, Creationist biologists acknowledge observations of evolution. However, this observation of small changes cannot reasonably be extrapolated to explain the diversity of life forms as no observation supports that. Evolutionists seek to escape this conundrum by...

I don't know what you mean by this but I did not start a thread on that topic. In that thread, you seemed to reference the OP not addressing something in another thread. IMO, it's hard enough to keep track of a conversation in a single thread, let alone cross reference conversations among...

Agreed. That is precisely what you are not doing. You are instead imposing your trinitarian dogma onto unitarian text. Yes, you did and I just called you out on it. It shows you have lost the argument. Agreed. @Rich R wrote recently that it is written in Scripture 37 times that Jesus is the...

In a conversation with @marks, I've come to realize an aspect of Christology is the senses of words that there is a common lack of discernment. These include the fact that there are dozens of lords mentioned in Scripture and there are also, not false but REAL lowercase gods in Scripture. Most...

Again, you go to the exclamation that is not even a sentence.

I've answered this question numerous times. And others to have answered it. You just cannot accept that God referring to others in heaven does not in any way support the trinity.

No, I am not calling Jesus a liar.

I agree the verse is awkwardly worded but the key part is the negation, NOT. Suppose a sentence read "I did NOT think of going to Paris." It's the height of absurdity to use that as evidence that, not only did I think of going to Paris, but I actually did go to Paris.

Then you ADD to God's word as nowhere is says merely a part of Jesus died. This shows you're willing to distort God's word to protect your IDOL.