Search results

Let’s start with your rejection criteria. The following sets of words would be deemed by me, Marks, as going against the trinity: - - -

Non-specific rejections are not value added. Twice I’ve asked you to be specific with what you don’t understand. This exchange supports the lack of rejection criteria.

Sounds to me that you are again relying on a bad translation. 17 For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has ever seen God; the only Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he has made him known John 1:17-18 Revised Standard Version

Mark, you do this all the time! Your question was answered in the OP. What specific question about the OP do you have? What did I write that is confusing to you?

I guess you did not read - and understand - the OP. What specifically in the OP do you not understand?

It is funny how you continue to think copy-and-pasting is a substitute for discussion. To wit, Focus on What You Can Control, Leave What You Can't - Becoming Who You Are

It does not seem your post is the least bit responsive to the exchange.

In fact, such verses would never be written IF the authors embraced trinitiarianism. Here is another 1 COR 15:57 But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. IF it is significant that there is a verse that mentions all 3 members of the trinity, it must also be...

Dares to suggest that ethics are relevant? That you are a Cultural Marxist is seen, in part, by your failure to distinguish between ethics and politics. You quack like a duck, fly like a duck and sound like a duck. So, there is that. Equity, the new buzz word Leftists are perverting. Being...

A well written statement of idolatry - not just of the trinity but of the book from which it does not come from. I truly cannot fathom this obsession with mystery. The goal is having a relationship with our Creator and being guided at all points by his divine Will for us. And by the way, the...

I misunderstood. It seems I typed 3 rather than 4. I’ll fix the OP.

Yes. Holding unequal things as equal is a perversion. It is the application of the idea that is perverted, not the idea itself. You advocated communisim or Cultural Marxism but pervertedly call it equality. We are unequal independent of social ills. Not denied but who is paying for it...

The question of Jesus having a God is not limited to sense.

Well, I hoped other verses would be added as the conversation unfolds. What about v14 exemplifies this?

Agreed. Sadly, the perversion of equality has infected many Christians.

Still don't grasp agency huh?

One who knows Thomas did not claim Jesus IS God. Note, his lack of a complete sentence. Who are you to read into Thomas' words?

Jesus said he has a God who is the only true God. Does it make sense to you that God has a God?

What verse says this again?

Any one verse that reads something like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever.