Search results

Not an answer to my question. No wonder. Trinitarians fear to tread on any possible rejection criteria for their doctrine.

But it is a valid inference from the text as a possibility. That’s my point of the Sh’ma violators, like you. Sure, the text you cite could support violating the Sh’ma but it could also be taken in a way that it is not. I honestly do not understand the intensity of the drive to conjecture...

No sir. Scripture explicitly and repeatedly says Jesus was a man. See the difference?

Scripture does not say anything like this.

Appeal to Majority.

I’m not making an argument. Just stating an observation from a confession

You changed reference point from harmonizing to discounting.

I don’t have to think it. Scripture explains that’s what happens. Why else would anyone pray, if not to influence our Creator?

Hold on, who loved and gave? And what did this Being give?

Never heard how God authorized the deception of 400 of Ahab's prophets? Start there.

We do, just not literally so. 1st, our lord's name is not literally Immanuel. So, it's odd that you take him to being Immanuel, god with us, to be literal. That's a dead give away, it is figurative. 2nd, Is everyone named Immanuel also God? If not, why not? 3rd, there are many instance in...

I've asked this same question many time. No answer.

Why are you so passionate about this? One person explained how NATURAL are god's default settings and MIRACULOUS are when he decides to supercede his default settings. An example is a ball dropping. The ball drops because of God's default setting of gravity. If he were to supercede by...

Trinitarians seem to give no significance to evidence of fraud, in imposing trinitarian dogma onto monotheist text. It made me ask WHY, what motivated the translators to commit these forgeries? The obvious answer is the actual word of God does not support trinitarianism as much as they'd like...

Not quite right. Just harminized differently. How do you harmonize the plural pronouns here with the singular pronouns used 1,000's of other times, especially in the 1C?

You teach imposing your trinitarian dogma onto monotheist text. Being wrong doesn't have to be hard to understand.

Speculation. Here is another valid interpretation. All men exist before being born, including Jesus. Doesn't make them God.

AS IF there is any other part of Jesus. If Jesus did not die - in his entirety - then his sacrifice was in vain because Scripture tells us death is the penalty for sin - not some partial payments may be acceptable.

I don't speak or think in these terms. I'd have to research what you are specifically saying here to give an answer. Again, I don't think so. If it is not a miracle, then it reduces to a NATURAL force behind the event taking place. They way I look at such things after reading Augustin's...

Exacly what I am doing and you are not. Mark 1:1 says Jesus is the son of God. This is repeated nearly 40 times. And he is not said to be what you claim. So, you are relying on your own understanding in opposition to the actual word of God.