Search results

<sigh> I understand you better than you seem to understand yourself as I've pointed out the dynamic that repeats is apparently a blind spot of yours. What you do is make assertions and when it cannot hold up to scrutiny, you back off. This whole thread is a testament to this aspect of your...

Mark, I love God. I love Jesus. I pray for the Holy Spirit multiple times each day. I love you as a brother in Christ. I pray you remain a valuable and loved contributor to this forum and enjoy the experience. It sounds like debating is wearing on you. Your assertions are not being greeted as...

I don't know. Some threads don't interest me. So, I do not post in them. If these debates are actually a concern to you, consider letting them be active without your participation. As one church I went to said. Give until it feels good, not until it hurts. I just thank God that not everyone...

So said the less tolerant Pharisee's to Jesus.

Well, more to the point, an active forum sells. If 80% of the forum activity is on a given topic, why would a self-interested forum act to undermine it's own success of attracting potential customers?

No, you are not simply quoting what the website itself says. And you do this Mark. You make assertions then back off when they don't hold up to scrutiny.

No. Look into Ayn Rand's notion of an Anti-concept. The most important purpose of anti-concepts is to erode one's capacity to reason. There are such things as invalid concepts. When one integrates invalid concepts into the world view, it erodes ones confidence in existence and especially in...

By way of comparison, Pluto was recently officially demoted as a planet in our solar system. I am more passionate about this than most and can debate the topic. Yet, I realize and accept that Pluto has been officially demoted as a planet in our solar system.

Mark, that does not answer my question. IF the purpose of the unorthodox forum was merely for debate, it would not exist, but be rolled into the debate forum. Seems to me you have realized that your debate tactics have failed miserably and so have decided to take a different tact; Appeal to...

One would suppose Matthew 1:1 states the hypostatic union, the way trinitarians put it.

What year was that creed issued?

I think final 6, with him coming in 2028 (but I hope you are right),

A lot of politically incorrect references to his manhood.

Hmmm. LOL What makes you think I am not male?

I think so because knowledge is secondary to faith. A number of years ago I thought about the pure loving relationship I have with my grandkids. Too young to get into weighty matters, they have no idea what my political and religious beliefs are. All they know is that I spend time with them...

But Jesus is not God. In Rev 3:12 he referenced his God 4 times in that one verse. Odd thing for a God to do, refer to his God over and over again, isn't it? You are not invested in Jesus Christ but in trinitarianism, who makes the son out to be our father, who alone is god. If you did any...

I did not think you'd have the intellectual courage to meet the challenge. Maybe I'll start another thread on this topic.

Another brilliant post but I'm afraid it is pearls before swine. Though commanded to love their enemies by their lord, the term Watchtower and JW is used by many here as a pejorative. The relentless slander is atrocious, proving what the 4th century historian, Ammianus, said, no wild beasts...

Really? I suppose the rub is what constitutes errors of other denominations that are below the line of 'fundamental'? Seems to me a false or artificial line is being drawn.

Not wrong but incomplete. They don't know who the Christ is or his God, their God, our God. Arguably worse, the don't know our God's 1C and who benefits from violating it. Who would hatch such a scheme to deprive the one true God of all glory, dividing it not just once but twice more?