Search results

No, you do not get me at all in switching God, in his wholeness, in his unitarian nature, in Scripture in the beginning with ‘the Father.’ You do this because you realize the contradiction.

Speculation, offsetting 5,000 times God is referred to using singular pronouns. Friend, in the NAME of all that is holy and good (not names); this is normal language usage.

And your theory is to COMPLETELY DISREGARD that our lord was an adult when he was baptized along with everyone else specifically identified in Scripture to speculate that ‘family’ could possibly include children and infants. Talk about going as far away from following Jesus AND get away with it?!

It’s so much like Dr. Seus.

Top of the list, along with the death of a spouse. Honestly, I lost the will to live when he died. My solemn prayer many nights is to go home to be with him again.

I only believe in one Jack. If Jack said ‘let US make X in OUR image according to OUR likeness,’ I would reach the obvious conclusion that Jack was talking to somebody else. Only a mystical dualist would conclude the other is himself.

A heretic conclusion that still not a trinity. A heretic conclusion that goes against the Sh’ma, the 1C, ‘For us there is one God, the Father’, and Jesus himself telling us he has a God who is the only true God. So, you have to ask yourself, do you rely on your conclusion or what Jesus, etc...

This is how you know it is figurative. Same as us being made in the image of the invisible God. Doesn’t make us God. No. We represent accurately the monotheist Scripture without imposing false trinitarian doctrine onto it.

Oh God! Not another thread hijacked by OSAS. This thread is about the meaning of faith. I had to double check.

You do. That’s why I say that you are so funny. It sure is.

You say it is not a lie then IMMEDIATELY invoke a verse that does NOT say what you claim. In your parlance, it is your opinion that John 1 says that Jesus was with the Father in the beginning. However, if you examine the text, you will find it does not reference Jesus OR the Father in the...

Just another fallacious trinitarian talking point. We don’t determine equality based on the one way they are different. That’s how inequality is determined.

Rich already listed about 5 things God cannot do according to Scripture. So, you again accept contradictions or must accept your literal interpretation is incorrect.

Mary, you don't have eyes to see. Baptizing infants is not in Scripture. Therefore, it is a manmade tradition. Your commitment to not follow Christ, not follow God's word is typical of RCC and why we can NEVER be reunited.

Sure you can! This is because none of the Scripture you quoted say anything like the trinity doctrine, The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned...

This has to rank as THE biggest, boldest, bald faced lie trinitarians tell. Jesus died. God is eternal. Jesus is a man. God is not a man. Hosea 11:9 Jesus is flesh. God is Spirit. Jesus submitted to God. God did not submit to Jesus' will. God is the Creator. Jesus, being a son, is a created...

Even better- Scripture SHOWS that only adults were baptized. And again, you are missing the Christ. Do you follow Christ or rationalize why you don’t. We have our answer for the necessity of the Protestant Reformation.

Pinseeker is so funny! He just makes things up as he goes AND fully believes it. I Love too how he uses fancy words AS IF that solidifies his abuse of language usage is valid.

Only when trinitarians say so. Otherwise no.

You sound like a Bublical unitarian.