Search results

Mary, you are devoted to defending your manmade tradition. Jesus was baptized as an adult, along with everyone else in Scripture who was baptized. The only question is; are you going to follow Christ OR rationalize why you don’t?

Faith and trust are virtual synonyms. Out fallen world has many philosophical tenets that are flat out wrong. One is 'don't assume.' Well, you have to assume to function as the basis for the next step of action. One either assumes the Creator is trusworthy and faithfull or you don't. Atheists...

Bears repeating. It is so obvious if one reads the monotheist text without imposing one's doctrine onto it.

A Baptist told me we, Christians, don't believe in serendipity, in mere coincidences. We call it Providence. As well we should IF we were of an arrogant mind set to blame God for his exercise of divine sovereignty. You cannot be the Creator of all things but then rationalize an escape for the...

Great topic

It's as far from an opinion as one can get! The trinity is not in the Bible. Simple fact. Only by inventing an amazing Strawman argument with artificial synthesis can you attempt to make it appear that the opposite is true. For instance, I've heard things like 'everything in Scripture points to...

So, tell me about your loss? How long did you know him? In what capacity did you know him? How did he impact your life?

Really? I’m sure you know your Bible better than that! An angel guarded the Tree of Life. God sent Moses to Pharaoh, along with flies, toads. A spirit was sent by God to deceive Ahab’s 400 false prophets. He sent Jeremiah to Anoint David, Angels to proclaim the coming of the Baptist and the...

I know you do this but the contradiction is in denying the "me" in the 1C is singular and is a command, the 1st command, our Creator gave. It must be important to recognize him as a singular being since that is the 1C.

You make BS sound so complicated, it must be true. God. Lord. Not the same. No one is denying Jesus is our lord. It's just that he is not God. He is explicitly called the son of God, which proves in simple language that he is not God. His God is not called "Father" but YHWH. The way we relate...

Not an answer to my question. This reveals trinitarians cannot admit there is a rejection criteria for their doctrine.

Oh, great what verse is it that Jesus explicitly declared himself to be God incarnate? I don't think you believe what you are peddling, otherwise you would have already produced the verse. Instead, you put the burden on others to read into text such as via artificial synthesis, a technique that...

The last laugh is on you because marriage is about procreation. That's what it truly means for two to become one flesh (their offspring).

Just pile contradiction on top of contradiction. It is your best bet to appear to make sense.

You misunderstood me. YHWH is the personal name of God. My point was no one knows the personal name of the Holy Spirit. Father and son are relational names. The personal name of the son of God is Jesus, not Son.

Again, artificial synthesis. You only take passages that appear to support your doctrine but passages that destroy it - like Jesus saying he has a God who is the only true God - is summarily ignored. See the difference?

Trinitarians cannot help but invoke artificial synthesis. It is the VERY reason you don't quote that single trinitarian verse. For instance. You want the reader to connect these dots artificially and out of context because it is the only way to make your doctrine have even the appearance of...

And the part you are blind to is that it also can be used to modify different antecedants.

Nothing you quoted is remotely is like The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & Holy Spirit who are co-equal, co-substantial and co-eternal - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved but are damned to hell forever.

LOL Just where do you suppose non-trinitarians get indoctrinated?