Search results

Thank you. I pride myself in being committed to the truth - even if it is politically incorrect, goes against the majority, etc. Last year I realized the truth of Jehovah witnesses, that most translations remove God's personal name. I read 2 Bibles cover to cover, NLT and CEV and did not...

1st, that doesn't answer my question about Ps 110:1. (I guessed we'd have to add that to the list of questions you do not answer for it exposes the error of your belief) 2nd, I saw that you posted this many times but with no foundation. How, specifically, does he NWT says JW's are WRONG?

This alone deserves its own thread. Bravo!

Untrue. I prefer to reference several translations, none of which is JW. Depending on the verse, no one translation appeals to me most. Because I am not into ancient languages, I rely more than most on the translators expertise. Bottom line: the JW translation is superior than most in the...

Blood Type Compatibility Predictor | Fairfax Cryobank Sperm Bank

Another mystical tangent, claiming the inside track on special understanding WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY ignoring explicit Scripture that goes against your mysticism.

The burden of proof is on the one making a positive claim. Scripture ONLY shows examples of baptizing adults. IF you want to follow Christ, keep in mind he was ~30 years old when he was baptized.

Please construct a stronger anti-trinitarian statement than Paul wrote, For us there is one God, the Father. Pretty strong anti-trinitarian.

You say it is silly while also not being able to admit what the purpose is NOT. That’s silly!

Where did the blood come from?

Trinitarianism rests on mystical dualism, the principle that jettison's logic and asserts contradictions exist. There are no options and there are many options. Jesus is IN and at the same time, Jesus is OUT. Not only that, perniciously, Jesus is FULLY in and FULLY out. He's dead but only a...

You say this with such vehemence AS IF we have any obligation to 'understand' the 'mystery of God.' However he revealed himself is as good as any other. The point is he revealed himself and spoke directly, not mystically, e.g., the 1C is you shall have no other gods (including the trinitarian...

This ranks among the most bizarre rationalizations. 1st, The son of God is called Jesus, not Immanuel. 2nd, to say a word that means X ought to be taken literally is without foundation. For instance, Peter’s name means rock. So, that means by using the same rationalization, that Peter IS a...

False Alternative. I accept Jesus is what Scripture says, the son of God, sent by God to save the world. Mark 1:1.

Bullseye. Hence, mystic.

Trinitarians want to invent new definitions, rules of logic and language usage if that is what it takes to support their doctrine. Scripture say 'son of God.' They read this as 'God the son' (and jettison the pesky 'of'). Only one very uneducated, only one very idoctrinated could possibly think...

1st, no. God did not say this. A bad translation might render it so generically) 2nd, a description is not unique but a personal name is. God said to Moses his personal name was not Jesus and that name he is to be remembered for all generations? Do you know the personal name of God?

Not really what I asked, is it?

Telling the son of God he is not God is no bigger deal than telling Hunter that he is not the President. If I were to tell that to Hunter - or any son - I can imagine how befuddled he’d be that one would feel it necessary to state the obvious. Speaking of which, you are so adamant that Jesus...

If course you offer a theoretical mountain of evidence but is practice, you are foolishly relying on unitarian text to support trinitarian ideology. The precise reason Jesus is only the expression of God is because he is not God. The exact voice recording of me is not me.