Search results

I'm at a loss to understand how you can say this. When someone begs "save me," it is not a violation of their will to save them. I don't know one Christian who feels violated by being sealed by the Holy Spirit. True. Not all prayers are answered in the affirmative. Not all who call out "Lord...

Trump never let me down. Everyday was Xmas when he was POTUS. I so look forward to his 2nd term, which I hope will usher in the 2nd Coming.

The trinitarian explanation for this is anti-logic, the mystical principle of dualism. Not only is God 3-in-1, one of those is 2-in-1. Then, they show off their anti-logic math skills and claim this 2-in-1 person of the godhead is 100% god and 100% not god (man). Maybe that needs to be...

You mean it still is a question of "if"?

Fortunately, I put JimB on my ignore list long ago. In fact, I think he broke the record in getting on that prestigeous list faster than any other poster. :(

I doubt it but that's OK. We don't have to agree on everything. Don't you get it?! It's not about agreement but relationships. There is not doctrinal purity test in Scripture as a condition to be saved. Unlike you, we don't try to force our views on others. One thing I admire about @Ferris...

Foreign Aid is a euphamism for money laundering.

Yes, it’s called denomination.

I really like your list overall. This is the only one I do not agree with. It takes a while for a person to get their bearings in a new job. Rather, I propose: Any politician who votes for a budget that is not balanced cannot run for re-election. It takes 2/3 vote to pass a budget in deficit...

What do you propose as a better alterntive?

What I love is how trinitarians react to their analogies breaking down. In this case, water exists in 4 phases, not 3. They just ignore it. @Aunty Jane wrote a piece a few months back delving into the Pagan origins for the fascination with the number 3. I think @RedFan knows the logic...

I leave you to your mystical contradictions.

Definition.

There you go! Changing your frame of reference again! What you are saying is an epistemological joke, changing the very meaning or words as you go to support your mysticism of asserting we live in an unknowable universe. A collection is a group of like individuals, not as far as the environment...

Contradictions bring things together also - improperly.

True but I'm not sure what your point is. Some concepts exist as primary, which is to say, they don't depend on other concepts. One example of primary is existence or reality of truth, e.g., a bird singing. Most concepts are secondary, which is to say, they depend on a reference to something...

Is this absolutely true?

Untrue. Axioms are not opinions.

And I should add: Which of these statements is inherently self-contradictory: X. I know nothing. Y. I know that there are some things I don't know. Which of these statements is inherently self-contradictory: A. There are absolutes. B. There are no absolutes.

Again, for your conveinence.