Search results

I don't understand how you are connecting the 2 as they seem independent? I think 1 Corinthians 15:45-49 explains beautifully along with v 21-28. The seed of Adam was corrupt. So, God started anew Creation in Jesus, through which redemption of us all is to unfold.

While I am not part of the OSAS crowd, you support your position using OT standards, Old Covenant consequences, which never applied to the Gentiles to begin with, which most Christians are. Thank God it is about relationships because if it were based on my own performance, while outstanding in...

No. Your own analysis proves this to be untrue. YHWH is masculine not feminine. An attribute, his spirit, is not a person but is referred to using the feminine form. Not only are they not the same person, a spirit is not a person at all but an attribute of a person, of a Being.

Specifically, Sola Scriptura is a statement in reaction to church abuse to not rely on the contrivances of man but the word of God alone. Luther said, by this convict me. They could only convict him of violating their own corrupt politically and economically driven edicts. One of my favorites...

Absurd. Words are WHAT's not WHO's. Using words is an attribute of being, not a separate Being. The most anti-trinitarian book in the whole Bible, John also explicitly tells us at 20:31 that everything he wrote was to prove something other than the idea that Jesus is God; namely, that Jesus is...

Agreed. In another thread 'Jesus is God' the statement was made that the trinity MUST be taken on faith. Why this is a must is another Trinitarian leap.

Jesus forgave sins and delegated that power to the Apostles. John 20:23.

Not sure where you get the idea that religion is about proof? Moreover, GIVEN we worship a living God, why do you think the original thoughts, prayers, meditations, feelings and responses to the faith NEED to be preserved rather than NEED to evolve as cultures, languages and scientific...

Yea, the agenda was the tradition's of man to cancel the word of God. The 'early church Father' is not Scripture. And so you cancel the word of God in order to hand down your own tradition. And this is only one example among many others. Mark 7:13 NLT

Is that you being a human with 5 distinct parts? body mind conscience heart emotions

A trinitarian translation invention. Translations that don't have "James" in the title have it right. 1 John 5:7-8 New Living Translation 7 So we have these three witnesses— 8 the Spirit, the water, and the blood—and all three agree.

So, you gave an insincere apology, doubling down on your sin. :rolleyes: Indeed.

This is the biggest logical fallacy trinitarians embrace; that the death of Jesus on the cross does not represent total and complete death in every literal manner, shape and form. If he did not die in the literal sense of the word, his sacrifice was in vain. There is absolutely nothing in...

You know you are not required to posts in threads you don’t agree with the OP premise, right? It takes 2 to argue/fight.

You know what you write is false because of Jesus’ response in v34-35.

I think we are all being tested now, to prepare us for the tribulation to come.

Complete fabrication. V1 is about God, who is the Father of our lord; it is not about our Lord until v14.

To reject this assumption, is to presume God is irrational.

I don't think you should be soliciting opinions online about such a subtle medical condition. If you've lost confidence in your psychiatrist, you should get a 2nd opinion from a certified psychiatrist. Much love!

Yup. The trinitarian position is weak, the only resort is to attack and attempt to shame one for not embracing the dogma.