Search results

You do realize that in scripture leaven represents sin do you not?

I don't care about this I care about what happened. If leavened bread was present, they broke the law. period all of this just so you feel you do not have to eat crackers at the lords supper? Good God, who cares what you eat.. Its NOT the passover meal or the feast of Unleavened bread.

so james wrote to himself? And in chapter 2 he spoke about himself?? What a joke man James said those people CLAIMED TO HAVE FAITH. He never said they HAD FAITH. Those people HAD NO WORK. And their Faith was DEAD NON EXISTENT Whats is amazing is you agree, he is teaching that if people do...

I am not lying You get a job and work to earn a wage, If you stop working you risk losing that wage. If you don’t work. You will not have a job. If your trying to earn salvation by works. And stop doing those works, You risk losing that salvation. If you stop doing those works. You will not...

Yep. So why do you not believe scripture? Did Jesus say some people get saved by faith in him, and others have to work to earn it?

Your still ignoring Context and the tradition. If I celebrate the lords supper with beer and cookies. Its not the lords supper If I celebrate the passover and the feast of UNLEAVENED BREAD with Leavened BREAD. Its not the passover or the feast of Unleavened bread

Ok, Yeah it is. Is that why you did it?

No I believe what Jesus and paul said. He who believes is not condemned, shall not be condemned, and will never die and live forever. James is not written to you all. You all do not teach licentiousness. Your problem is legalism. You need to study paul

Sorry maam. Anyone who teaches that something must be done in order to be saved, maintain salvation, or keep salvation Teaches salvation by works. Other than the jews. The Roman Catholic Church has the most works required for eternal salvation.

In other words. You can’t refute what I said. My answer is the ONLY obvious answer my friend. Otherwise. It makes no sense what Jesus said. The fact they went to stone him for blasphemy also supports my case. Moving on

Noipe I did not say that, I said you should listen to paul because he can help you. James can not. Because you do not have the issue that James was dealing with. Nice attempt to slander there by only giving part of what I said with no context. Well I guess I am anti alot of denomination...

I am always open to new ideas.. its how we learn :)

1st verse ;)

to be legalistic means one has to fulfill a set of legal terms in order to be released from prison. In the jewish case, It was follwoing the law in order to be saved in our case. It would be following a set of rules whatever they may be, to be released from the penalty of sin (saved).

The law also required perfection. Meaning no sin. We can;t keep the law. So I guess we water down the law by saying its ok as long as we get baptized, take the eucharist and do penance?? I find it amazing in all legalistic gospels. no matter what church it is, They water down the law. and put...

1. Saying I am should have meaning. It means nothing if it just means he is here now 2. He did not just say I AM. He actually said Before abraham was (in the greek the word ginomao - to become to take place to be formed, to be born to be created) I WAS (in the greek Ego Eimi - interestingly...

Not by works period. If it is of by works. then we are trying to earn salvation, It is not a gift. And we will all fail. Because you can nto do enough works to make up for one sin. let alone all the sins you have ever committed. The penalty of sin is death, Not obaying the law or obaying the...

Jesus said before abraham was, He always existed. How can that be if he was created 2000 years ago.. You have not given me any answer. Your illogical question does not compute. I was not before abraham was, even though God knew me before.. so it does nto work that way. Gods omniscience...

I have never really thought of it. I believe it was passover week. I have heard thursday and friday. Ths issue is the 3 days and night. and risen Sunday morning.

This is true But in the upper room. he was celebrating the feast of unleavened bread and passover with his disciples That MUST be taken in context. In doing so . he had to obey the rules. If he brought leavened bread to a Passover mean and unleavened bread feast. He was not celebrating either...