Search results

Yes, they reject the KJV template because it is wrong. One of the biggest misconceptions of KVJ-only-ism is the idea that modern translations start with the KJV and go down hill from there. That is not what happens in modern translations. They go back to the beginning. Not only do we know much...

Yes, but will you quietly and submissively go to your death as Jesus did?

Yes, you have been busy - but not busy loving and forgiving.

There it is! The Church Bashers complete lack of grace, void of the Spirit of God.

Yea, too bad for you. You failed the humility test. Only others have the burden to endure scrutiny.

Jesus is the truth, not your doctrine. Again, let me remind you that there is no doctrinal purity test to be saved. What does that tell you?

Not an answer to my question.

"Pointing out" is not bashing. Stop appealing to Strawman! And yes, we are NOT to judge. Who the hell do you think you are? (We only have the right to judge those we have authority over.) Even our lord refused to judge - even when he was invited to do so! Luke 12:13-14. What does that tell you...

Then you are changing the subject under discussion. But I am disturbed by the Christians on this forum who put themselves as judge - over people and doctrine. It is far more than acknowledge transgression, iniquity and sin. It is a pathway to rationalizing the first sin, pride. We are not God...

Sad. John 1:1 does not even mention Jesus and has nothing to do with Emmanual meaning 'God is with us.' What a desperate reaching for text that does not support your doctrine! Can I say Anyone who denies this has the spirit of ant-God? Deuteronomy 6:4.

Not us, them. But I almost didn't notice the dodge of the point that it applies to other translations EQUALLY.

Notice, your reference does not say anything like bash people who don't hold the same doctrines you do.

Can never be found in the KJV! Again, Jesus did not speak the king’s English.

Wrong. Knowledge does not necessarily progress linearly. The Dead Sea scrolls were discovered in the 20th century. Ditto to Archmedes calculus. The Rosetta Stone in the 19th century. While we lost the formula for Roman cement, far more durable than modern cement, you must concede it could be...

Modern translators know Hebrew and Greek - as well as modern 21st century American - far better than those from half a Millenia ago.

It’s odd double standards you have, AS IF it doesn’t apply EQUALLY to other English translations.

No one should expect more from a translation.

It doesn’t make sense to you because you are putting your doctrine before God’s word. For instance, putting aside this one point, the overwhelming Biblical evidence is against the trinity. Just 3 points of consideration: The trinity is not in the Bible - not the word, not the doctrine. The...

Your insecurity is showing.

If one wants to, one can synthesize any doctrine by this procedure. Hardly proof. Given that his name is NOT Emmanuel (but Jesus), it Scripturally proves the opposite of what you claim. Beyond your idolatrous commitment to your heresy, I don’t know why you don’t get this. Have a nice day.