Search results

You do know that Jesus did not speak the king's English, right?

I will never use the KJV - even inclusively.

Putting aside your Ad Homenim, scripture does not differentiate between sin - except lack of forgiveness and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Your doctrine proliferations doctrine beyond God's words. What, to use common sense? If I am to believe He's so inept, how am I in the same breath...

That is the accusation. I don't by it. I prefer modern "thought" translations for readability. Literal word translations are too choppy for me to enjoy. Without getting embroiled in doctrinal disputes, an example of the syntax is like this. Jesus was outside in the rain. Jesus then came inside...

Who is God talking to? Not us.

You are projecting. It is you who have failed to prove this claim Guess what. The son of God was not called Emmanuel. You are so desperate to proof your heresy. Sad. This conversation is going nowhere. I’ll let you have the last word.

I already have proved it. You just don’t have ears to hear.

Odd that you suppose God would allow one type of sin and even many types of sin but not this type of sin. :eek: Such is the power of trinitarian idolatry. :mad: In another thread I asked this question and wonder what your answer is, A or B? A. Bring people to Jesus, even if they do not...

Can't it just be error? I am certain there was conspiracy in the 4th century.

This is not in Scripture. Where do trinitarians even get the idea the Isaiah verse applies to the Messiah? HINT: It does not. Also, "God with us" hardly means literally but rather God will light our path, protect us and ensure victory.

It's so funny how don't realize your own hypocrisy; don't hold yourself to standards you hold others to.

Your opinion not a quote from Scripture.

Well, there is the hatefulness others have noticed. Do women ‘spit leaven out once they’ve swallowed it?’ What does that expression even mean? You seem to have pre-determined that there is no way to resolve conflict with, dare I say it? These men? I pray God’s spirit bring you peace.

My apologies. I was just using an example in response to your question about using "him." Understanding the situation better, it seems to me to be less about you being hateful and more about you not forgiving. Have you even told the Pastor how strongly you oppose the points he makes? No one on...

What? According to you, that article died not apply to you since you are not mocking. :p

I’m not sure why you are invoking a doctrinal purity test as an obstacle to fellowship with living, breathing siblings in Christ. I am CERTAIN no church I ever went to had 100% doctrinal alignment. How did I respond to this reality? I forgave and loved them anyway. Make a Blessed Day!

How to interpret unitarian text from a unitarian perspective, given explicit unitarian verses, such as For us, there is one God the Father? In the verse you cite above, the most important fact is that it reinforces that Jesus is not God. The text proof is that it explicitly states God is...

No. I often use the genderless word "one." For instance, For those people who hate, it says more about the one doing the hating than those they hate. BTW, I often use the "his" and "man" as you do unless I am being critical generally of people. So, it is truly a doctrinal dispute. It sounds...

If it is not Ad Homenim, then stop all your playing, poking fun, LOL-ing, etc. :p It all just a form of mocking. The Mocking Spirit vs The Holy Spirit | Daily Manna (wordpress.com) The problem is non-trinitarians, like me, have the burden to change. You have no burden to stop mocking. You...

Whatever happened to ...?