Search results

This is the trinitarian heresy: Making believing the trinity a condition of salvation and fellowship, which is found nowhere in Scripture.

Nowhere in Scripture is Jesus referred to in capital LORD, only lowercase lord, of which there are many lords in Scripture but only one LORD, who is God, the Father alone.

These verses are excellent to support equality under the law argument. These verses do not say the law applies to Gentiles generally, only a handful of sojourners who traveled in the Israeli community who left Egypt. Interesting question. The whole world is condemned as fallen offspring of...

How do you figure that when Ex 20:2 says the covenant pertains specifically to those he rescued from the land of Egypt the place of the Hebrew slavery? Exodus 20:1-3 New Living Translation Ten Commandments for the Covenant Community 20 Then God gave the people all these instructions: 2 “I am...

Thanks for making this point. I was going to point out how v 18 is one of many that undermine trinitarianism by having only the dynamic duo as @APAK likes to say: God, in his unitarian nature, and his Son. Nowhere is the HS mentioned in this critical verses. Cooper. Basic logic here. Has God...

The Gospel of John is the most anti-trinitarian book of the NT. The vaguer the statement the more adamant trinitarians assert it proves Christ divinity. it is certain that John 1 cannot be used for this purpose because John explicitly tells us @ 20:31 everything he wrote was for another...

Except it’s not true. Scripture is explicit Jesus is not God but God’s son and God is the Father alone.

To what end test works to see if they stand or fail?

Judging works and not the people who made the works is an artificial dichotomy. In any contest, the work does not win the prize but the person who performed the work.

Pure contrivance, illogical and anti-Scriptural. “Christ” means Anointed, not God incarnate. Who was Christ Anointed by? God, in his unitarian nature. Scripture says Jesus is our ONLY mediator to God. Therefore, he cannot be God or we have no mediator. Also, Scripture says explicitly For us...

Pharisee. Luke 18:10-14 I am grateful for AJ’s contributions to this forum.

I understand. It seems to me a matter of MEANS compared to the ENDS. See John 17:22, where Scripture aims us as becoming one with God.

So? No requirement to respond? The very definition of irresponsible! Bless your heart! I’ll make it easy for you. According to 1 Cor 3:13 above, is every man’s work judged/tested/rewarded/revealed? Yes or No?

While ignoring how my question relates to the verse of God judging by man’s works also.

A distinction without a difference. All I said was judgment/rewards of works is what Scripture says in the verse. Taken took the thread down a long diversion. But to your point, the idea of judging/rewarding a man’s works but not the man has no application.

Both. The virus is real. The hysteria and agenda to use it for nefarious purposes is also certainly an invention. Socialism. An idea so good, it has to be mandatory.

The question of history aside, the question of who is and is not here remains debated, despite the fact that the trinity is not in the Bible. I read a great book on point called When Jesus became God by Rubenstein. The heresy in the 4th century won due to politics; the Roman emperor killed...

See below. Scripture says judgment will be based on man’s work. You’ve made so many posts to divert from this it’s hard to keep count but the post above relies on ‘many things’ as a means to deny God judges based on man’s works.

This is where Gods timing builds our virtue of patience.

I’ve already answered that several times now. You have a doctrine that supersedes God’s Word. In the verse in question, God says he’ll judge/reward people’s works. What is your point of carrying on?